Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25078380›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

CCAST: a model-based gating strategy to isolate homogeneous subpopulations in a heterogeneous population of single cells.

Benedict Anchang, Mary T Do, Xi Zhao, Sylvia K Plevritis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Modeling of cytometry data in logarithmic space: When is a bimodal distribution not bimodal?Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2018
    Article
  9. DRUG-NEM: Optimizing drug combinations using single-cell perturbation response to account for intratumoral heterogeneity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A benchmark for evaluation of algorithms for identification of cellular correlates of clinical outcomes.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benedict AnchangDepartment of Radiology, Center for Cancer Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Mary T DoDepartment of Radiology, Center for Cancer Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Xi ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Center for Cancer Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Sylvia K PlevritisDepartment of Radiology, Center for Cancer Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

MODELING THE ROLE OF PROGRESSION IN FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMAU54CA149145 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A model-based gating strategy is developed for sorting cells and analyzing populations of single cells. The strategy, named CCAST, for Clustering, Classification and Sorting Tree, identifies a gating strategy for isolating homogeneous subpopulations from a heterogeneous population of single cells using a data-derived decision tree representation that can be applied to cell sorting. Because CCAST does not rely on expert knowledge, it removes human bias and variability when determining the gating strategy. It combines any clustering algorithm with silhouette measures to identify underlying homogeneous subpopulations, then applies recursive partitioning techniques to generate a decision tree that defines the gating strategy. CCAST produces an optimal strategy for cell sorting by automating the selection of gating markers, the corresponding gating thresholds and gating sequence; all of these parameters are typically manually defined. Even though CCAST is optimized for cell sorting, it can be applied for the identification and analysis of homogeneous subpopulations among heterogeneous single cell data. We apply CCAST on single cell data from both breast cancer cell lines and normal human bone marrow. On the SUM159 breast cancer cell line data, CCAST indicates at least five distinct cell states based on two surface markers (CD24 and EPCAM) and provides a gating sorting strategy that produces more homogeneous subpopulations than previously reported. When applied to normal bone marrow data, CCAST reveals an efficient strategy for gating T-cells without prior knowledge of the major T-cell subtypes and the markers that best define them. On the normal bone marrow data, CCAST also reveals two major mature B-cell subtypes, namely CD123+ and CD123- cells, which were not revealed by manual gating but show distinct intracellular signaling responses. More generally, the CCAST framework could be used on other biological and non-biological high dimensional data types that are mixtures of unknown homogeneous subpopulations.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAlgorithmsBiomarkersCell Line, TumorCell SeparationCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyHumansBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25078380
PMCPMC4117418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.