ArticleInternational orthopaedics2014
Routine one-stage exchange for chronic infection after total hip replacement.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does cemented or cementless single-stage exchange arthroplasty of chronic periprosthetic hip infections provide similar infection rates to a two-stage? A systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2016Pooled it
- Clinical and cost effectiveness of single stage compared with two stage revision for hip prosthetic joint infection (INFORM): pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Trial
- Article
- What Is the Role of Local Antimicrobial Protection for One-Stage Revision for Peri-Prosthetic Hip Infection?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Appropriate Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment for Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- High infection control rate after systematic one-stage procedure for shoulder arthroplasty chronic infection.International orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Early periprosthetic hip joint infection managed by cementless one-stage revision - a case series.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2022Article
- Systematic review of single stage revision for prosthetic joint infection.World journal of orthopedics · 2020Review
- The Role of One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2018Review
- Results and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) after One-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: A Single-centre Retrospective Study.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2018Article
- [Treatment of periprosthetic infections].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016Review
- Bilateral One-Stage Revision of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasties: Report of Two Cases and Management of Antibiotic Therapy.Case reports in orthopedics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe hypothesized that a routine one-stage exchange for treatment of chronically infected total hip replacement (THR) will lead to (1) a higher rate of infection recurrence and (2) a poorer hip outcome than the published rates after two-stage exchange.
methodsSixty-five cases have been treated consecutively with one-stage exchange. All patients have been followed for a period of three to six years or until death or infection recurrence.
resultsThe five-year rate for infection recurrence was 16%. The five-year survival rate for recurrence of the index infection was 8%. Forty-two percent of the hips had a good or excellent PMA score, and 46% a good or excellent OH score.
conclusionsRoutine one-stage exchange was not associated with a higher recurrence rate and a poorer hip function than previously published series of two-stage exchange. Therefore, there is little support to choose two-stage exchange as the routine treatment for management of chronically infected THR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25078367What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.