Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25078280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

5meCpG epigenetic marks neighboring a primate-conserved core promoter short tandem repeat indicate X-chromosome inactivation.

Filipe Brum Machado, Fabricio Brum Machado, Milena Amendro Faria, Viviane Lamim Lovatel, Antonio Francisco Alves da Silva, Claudia Pamela Radic, Carlos Daniel De Brasi, Álvaro Fabricio Lopes Rios, Susana Marina Chuva de Sousa Lopes, Leonardo Serafim da Silveira and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Maternal 5Frontiers in genetics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Filipe Brum MachadoDepartment of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabricio Brum MachadoLaboratory of Biotechnology, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos do Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Milena Amendro FariaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos do Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Viviane Lamim LovatelLaboratory of Biotechnology, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos do Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Antonio Francisco Alves da SilvaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos do Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Molecular Identification and Diagnostics Unit, Hospital Escola Álvaro Alvim, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Claudia Pamela RadicLaboratory of Molecular Genetics of Hemophilia, Institute of Experimental Medicine, National Academy of Medicine, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carlos Daniel De BrasiLaboratory of Molecular Genetics of Hemophilia, Institute of Experimental Medicine, National Academy of Medicine, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Álvaro Fabricio Lopes RiosLaboratory of Biotechnology, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos do Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Susana Marina Chuva de Sousa LopesDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, South Holland, the Netherlands.
Leonardo Serafim da SilveiraLaboratory of Animal Morphology and Pathology, Center for Studies and Research in Wildlife, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos do Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carlos Ramon Ruiz-MirandaLaboratory of Environmental Sciences, Sector of Studies of Ethology, Reintroduction and Conservation of Wild Animals, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos do Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ester Silveira RamosDepartment of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Enrique Medina-AcostaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos do Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Molecular Identification and Diagnostics Unit, Hospital Escola Álvaro Alvim, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
State University of Norte Fluminense · BRAcademia Nacional de Medicina · ARPrefeitura Municipal de Campos dos Goytacazes · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the epigenetic transcriptional silencing of an X-chromosome during the early stages of embryonic development in female eutherian mammals. XCI assures monoallelic expression in each cell and compensation for dosage-sensitive X-linked genes between females (XX) and males (XY). DNA methylation at the carbon-5 position of the cytosine pyrimidine ring in the context of a CpG dinucleotide sequence (5meCpG) in promoter regions is a key epigenetic marker for transcriptional gene silencing. Using computational analysis, we revealed an extragenic tandem GAAA repeat 230-bp from the landmark CpG island of the human X-linked retinitis pigmentosa 2 RP2 promoter whose 5meCpG status correlates with XCI. We used this RP2 onshore tandem GAAA repeat to develop an allele-specific 5meCpG-based PCR assay that is highly concordant with the human androgen receptor (AR) exonic tandem CAG repeat-based standard HUMARA assay in discriminating active (Xa) from inactive (Xi) X-chromosomes. The RP2 onshore tandem GAAA repeat contains neutral features that are lacking in the AR disease-linked tandem CAG repeat, is highly polymorphic (heterozygosity rates approximately 0.8) and shows minimal variation in the Xa/Xi ratio. The combined informativeness of RP2/AR is approximately 0.97, and this assay excels at determining the 5meCpG status of alleles at the Xp (RP2) and Xq (AR) chromosome arms in a single reaction. These findings are relevant and directly translatable to nonhuman primate models of XCI in which the AR CAG-repeat is monomorphic. We conducted the RP2 onshore tandem GAAA repeat assay in the naturally occurring chimeric New World monkey marmoset (Callitrichidae) and found it to be informative. The RP2 onshore tandem GAAA repeat will facilitate studies on the variable phenotypic expression of dominant and recessive X-linked diseases, epigenetic changes in twins, the physiology of aging hematopoiesis, the pathogenesis of age-related hematopoietic malignancies and the clonality of cancers in human and nonhuman primates.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticX Chromosome InactivationAnimalsBase SequenceCallithrixCell LineChromosomes, Human, XConserved SequenceCpG IslandsEye ProteinsFemaleGene FrequencyGTP-Binding ProteinsHemophilia AHumansEye ProteinsGTP-Binding ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsRP2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25078280
PMCPMC4117532
OpenAlexW1982818428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.