Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25078002›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2014

Beyond D-luciferin: expanding the scope of bioluminescence imaging in vivo.

Spencer T Adams, Stephen C Miller

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Red-Shifted Coumarin Luciferins for Improved Bioluminescence Imaging.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Visualizing MyoD Oscillations in Muscle Stem Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multiplex Hextuple Luciferase Assaying.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Spencer T AdamsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Stephen C MillerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA. Electronic address: Stephen.miller@umassmed.edu.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Enhanced synthetic luciferin substrates for firefly luciferaseR01EB013270 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MILLER, STEPHEN C. · 2011 to 2020
$2.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB013270NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB013270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The light-emitting chemical reaction catalyzed by the enzyme firefly luciferase is widely used for noninvasive imaging in live mice. However, photon emission from the luciferase is crucially dependent on the chemical properties of its substrate, D-luciferin. In this review, we describe recent work to replace the natural luciferase substrate with synthetic analogs that extend the scope of bioluminescence imaging.

Indexed as

BenzothiazolesLuminescenceAnimalsCell SurvivalLuciferasesOptical ImagingSubstrate SpecificityBenzothiazolesD-luciferinLuciferases

Identifiers

PMID25078002
PMCPMC4149945
OpenAlexW2072452384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.