Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25077770›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2015

Sifting Through It All: Characterizing Melanoma Patients' Utilization of the Internet as an Information Source.

Sarah Nicole Hamilton, Elena P Scali, Irene Yu, Eva Gusnowski, Paris-Ann Ingledew

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Viral Disease Goes Viral: Characterizing How Cancer Patients Use Internet Resources for COVID-19 Information.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  2. Quality of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Resources Available on the Internet.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  3. eHealth Literacy in German Skin Cancer Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Digesting the Contents: an Analysis of Online Colorectal Cancer Education Websites.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Caught in the net: Characterizing how testicular cancer patients use the internet as an information source.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Websites, Websites Everywhere: How Thyroid Cancer Patients Use the Internet.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Feasibility of Providing Web-Based Information to Breast Cancer Patients Prior to a Surgical Consult.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
  14. Malignant websites? Analyzing the quality of prostate cancer education web resources.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Internet Usage Trends in Thoracic Surgery Patients and Their Caregivers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017
    Article
  17. Peering into the Deep: Characterizing the Internet Search Patterns of Patients with Gynecologic Cancers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah Nicole HamiltonFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Elena P Scali
Irene Yu
Eva Gusnowski
Paris-Ann Ingledew

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes how melanoma patients used the Internet as a melanoma information source and how it impacted their clinical encounter and treatment decision. From 2010 to 2013, melanoma patients were invited to complete a 23-question paper survey with open- and close-ended questions. Thirty-one of the 62 patients approached completed the survey. The majority (90 %) of respondents used the Internet as a melanoma information source. Most (90 %) had used the search engine Google. The most commonly searched topics were melanoma treatment (96 %), screening (64 %), and prevention (64 %). While most respondents (85 %) found the Internet was a useful melanoma information source, over half (54 %) found melanoma websites at least somewhat difficult to understand. Many (78 %) believed it increased their understanding of their diagnosis, 71 % thought it influenced their treatment decision, and 59 % felt it impacted their specialist consultation. This study informs health care professionals that many melanoma patients search the Internet for information regarding their diagnosis and that it may impact their disease understanding and treatment decisions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedConsumer Health InformationFemaleHumansInternetMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.