ReviewJournal of bioenergetics and biomembranes2014
Roles of semiquinone species in proton pumping mechanism by complex I.
Review in Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel quinone biosynthetic pathway illuminates the evolution of aerobic metabolism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Understanding coenzyme Q.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
- An Abundant and Diverse New Family of Electron Bifurcating Enzymes With a Non-canonical Catalytic Mechanism.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Redox-coupled quinone dynamics in the respiratory complex I.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Article
- Roles of subunit NuoL in the proton pumping coupling mechanism of NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) from Escherichia coli.Journal of biochemistry · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex I (NDH-1) translocates protons across the membrane using electron transfer energy. Two different coupling mechanisms are currently being discussed for complex I: direct (redox-driven) and indirect (conformation-driven). Semiquinone (SQ) intermediates are suggested to be key for the coupling mechanism. Recently, using progressive power saturation and simulation techniques, three distinct SQ species were resolved by EPR analysis of E. coli complex I reconstituted into proteoliposomes. The fast-relaxing SQ (SQ(Nf)) signals completely disappeared in the presence of the uncoupler gramicidin D or the potent E. coli complex I inhibitor squamotacin. The slow-relaxing SQ (SQ(Ns)) signals were insensitive to gramicidin D, but they were sensitive to squamotacin. The very slow-relaxing SQ (SQ(Nvs)) signals were insensitive to both gramicidin D and squamotacin. Interestingly, no SQ(Ns) signal was observed in the ΔNuoL mutant, which lacks transporter module subunits NuoL and NuoM. Furthermore, we sought out the effect of using menaquinone (which has a lower redox potential compared to that of ubiquinone) as an electron acceptor on the proton pumping stoichiometry by in vitro reconstitution experiments with ubiquinone-rich or menaquinone-rich double knock-out membrane vesicles, which contain neither complex I nor NDH-2 (non-proton translocating NADH dehydrogenase). No difference in the proton pumping stoichiometry between menaquinone and ubiquinone was observed in the ΔNuoL and D178N mutants, which are considered to lack the indirect proton pumping mechanism. However, the proton pumping stoichiometry with menaquinone decreased by half in the wild-type. The roles and relationships of SQ intermediates in the coupling mechanism of complex I are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.