Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25077120›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open2014

Utilization and costs of home care for patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based study.

Nicole Mittmann, Ning Liu, Joan Porter, Soo Jin Seung, Hon, Pierre K Isogai, Refik Saskin, Matthew C Cheung, Natasha B Leighl, Jeffrey S Hoch and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cost trajectories for cancer patients.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nicole MittmannHealth Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. ; Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. ; International Centre for Health Innovation, Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
Ning LiuInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.
Joan PorterInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.
Soo Jin SeungHealth Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.
Hon
Pierre K IsogaiHealth Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.
Refik SaskinInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.
Matthew C CheungOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.
Natasha B LeighlPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.
Jeffrey S HochCentre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
Maureen TrudeauOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.
William K EvansDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Katie N DaintyLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
Craig C EarleInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont. ; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe utilization and costs of home care services provided for people with colorectal cancer is not well-known. We conducted an analysis to determine the utilization and costs of such services associated with each stage of colorectal cancer among patients in the province of Ontario.

methodsWe included cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed in Ontario between Jan. 1, 2005, and Dec. 31, 2009. Data were extracted from the Ontario Cancer Registry and linked to data from a home care administrative database. The types of services used were stratified by stage of disease and by phase of care (initial phase = 180 d after diagnosis, terminal phase = 180 d before death, continuing phase = interval between initial and terminal phases). Overall utilization rates and costs were determined, and regression analysis was used to examine associated factors.

resultsA total of 36 195 patients had colorectal cancer diagnosed during the study period; the median age was 71 (interquartile range 61-79) years. Home care services were provided to 24 641 patients (68.1%). The number of services per patient-year was 27.5, at a cost of $2180 per patient-year. The number of services provided per patient-year increased with increasing disease severity at diagnosis (15.5 at stage I, 25.5 at stage II, 32.5 at stage III and 62.5 at stage IV; 22.6 for unstaged disease). The cost of services per patient-year also increased with disease severity at diagnosis ($1170 at stage I, $1995 at stage II, $2727 at stage III and $5541 at stage IV). Publicly funded home care services and associated costs decreased with increasing income group, but they increased among patients who had a history of high health resource utilization. The mean 30-day cost of home care services decreased from the initial phase of care ($323) to the continuing phase ($160) but increased during the terminal phase ($616).

interpretationMore than two-thirds of the patients with colorectal cancer in this study used home care services. Those who received home care services used about 2 services per month in a one-year period, at a cost of about $2000 per year. This information can aid policy-makers in future decisions regarding resource allocations.

Identifiers

PMID25077120
PMCPMC3986021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.