Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25075972›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Female mate choice can drive the evolution of high frequency echolocation in bats: a case study with Rhinolophus mehelyi.

Sébastien J Puechmaille, Ivailo M Borissov, Sándor Zsebok, Benjamin Allegrini, Mohammed Hizem, Sven Kuenzel, Maike Schuchmann, Emma C Teeling, Björn M Siemers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sébastien J PuechmailleSensory Ecology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany; School of Biology & Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland; Tabachka Bat Research Station, Tabachka, Bulgaria.
Ivailo M BorissovSensory Ecology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany; Tabachka Bat Research Station, Tabachka, Bulgaria.
Sándor ZsebokSensory Ecology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany; Tabachka Bat Research Station, Tabachka, Bulgaria; MTA-ELTE-MTM Ecology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Benjamin AllegriniNaturalia environnement, Gallargues-le-Montueux, France.
Mohammed HizemTunis Superior Institute for Biological Applied Sciences, Tunis, Tunisia.
Sven KuenzelDepartment Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Maike SchuchmannSensory Ecology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany; Tabachka Bat Research Station, Tabachka, Bulgaria.
Emma C TeelingSchool of Biology & Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Björn M SiemersSensory Ecology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany; Tabachka Bat Research Station, Tabachka, Bulgaria.
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology · DEMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology · DEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals employ an array of signals (i.e. visual, acoustic, olfactory) for communication. Natural selection favours signals, receptors, and signalling behaviour that optimise the received signal relative to background noise. When the signal is used for more than one function, antagonisms amongst the different signalling functions may constrain the optimisation of the signal for any one function. Sexual selection through mate choice can strongly modify the effects of natural selection on signalling systems ultimately causing maladaptive signals to evolve. Echolocating bats represent a fascinating group in which to study the evolution of signalling systems as unlike bird songs or frog calls, echolocation has a dual role in foraging and communication. The function of bat echolocation is to generate echoes that the calling bat uses for orientation and food detection with call characteristics being directly related to the exploitation of particular ecological niches. Therefore, it is commonly assumed that echolocation has been shaped by ecology via natural selection. Here we demonstrate for the first time using a novel combined behavioural, ecological and genetic approach that in a bat species, Rhinolophus mehelyi: (1) echolocation peak frequency is an honest signal of body size; (2) females preferentially select males with high frequency calls during the mating season; (3) high frequency males sire more off-spring, providing evidence that echolocation calls may play a role in female mate choice. Our data refute the sole role of ecology in the evolution of echolocation and highlight the antagonistic interplay between natural and sexual selection in shaping acoustic signals.

Indexed as

EcholocationMating Preference, AnimalVocalization, AnimalAnimalsChiropteraFemaleMaleMolecular Sequence Data

Identifiers

PMID25075972
PMCPMC4116191
OpenAlexW2082020890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.