Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25074695›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2014

Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States: contemporary trends in incidence, utilization of the early invasive strategy, and in-hospital outcomes.

Sahil Khera, Dhaval Kolte, Wilbert S Aronow, Chandrasekar Palaniswamy, Kathir Selvan Subramanian, Taimoor Hashim, Marjan Mujib, Diwakar Jain, Rajiv Paudel, Ali Ahmed and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Platelet Glycoprotein IIIaJournal of clinical medicine research · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sahil KheraNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (S.K., D.K., W.S.A., C.P., K.S.S., M.M., D.J., R.P., W.H.F., J.A.P.).
Dhaval KolteNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (S.K., D.K., W.S.A., C.P., K.S.S., M.M., D.J., R.P., W.H.F., J.A.P.).
Wilbert S AronowNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (S.K., D.K., W.S.A., C.P., K.S.S., M.M., D.J., R.P., W.H.F., J.A.P.).
Chandrasekar PalaniswamyNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (S.K., D.K., W.S.A., C.P., K.S.S., M.M., D.J., R.P., W.H.F., J.A.P.).
Kathir Selvan SubramanianNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (S.K., D.K., W.S.A., C.P., K.S.S., M.M., D.J., R.P., W.H.F., J.A.P.).
Taimoor HashimUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (T.H., A.A.).
Marjan MujibNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (S.K., D.K., W.S.A., C.P., K.S.S., M.M., D.J., R.P., W.H.F., J.A.P.).
Diwakar JainNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (S.K., D.K., W.S.A., C.P., K.S.S., M.M., D.J., R.P., W.H.F., J.A.P.).
Rajiv PaudelNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (S.K., D.K., W.S.A., C.P., K.S.S., M.M., D.J., R.P., W.H.F., J.A.P.).
Ali AhmedUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (T.H., A.A.).
William H FrishmanNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (S.K., D.K., W.S.A., C.P., K.S.S., M.M., D.J., R.P., W.H.F., J.A.P.).
Deepak L BhattBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.L.B.).
Julio A PanzaNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (S.K., D.K., W.S.A., C.P., K.S.S., M.M., D.J., R.P., W.H.F., J.A.P.).
Gregg C FonarowDavid-Geffen School of Medicine University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA (G.C.F.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been a paradigm shift in the definition of timing of early invasive strategy (EIS) for patients admitted with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in the last decade. Data on trends of EIS for NSTEMI and associated in-hospital outcomes are limited. Our aim is to analyze temporal trends in the incidence, utilization of early invasive strategy, and in-hospital outcomes of NSTEMI in the United States. METHODS AND

resultsWe analyzed the 2002-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases to identify all patients ≥40 years of age with the principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and NSTEMI. Logistic regression was used for overall, age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-stratified trend analysis. From 2002 to 2011, we identified 6 512 372 patients with AMI. Of these, 3 981 119 (61.1%) had NSTEMI. The proportion of patients with NSTEMI increased from 52.8% in 2002 to 68.6% in 2011 (adjusted odds ratio [OR; per year], 1.055; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.054 to 1.056) in the overall cohort. Similar trends were observed in age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-stratified groups. From 2002 to 2011, utilization of EIS at day 0 increased from 14.9% to 21.8% (Ptrend<0.001) and utilization of EIS at day 0 or 1 increased from 27.8% to 41.4% (Ptrend<0.001). Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality in the overall cohort decreased during the study period (adjusted OR [per year], 0.976; 95% CI, 0.974 to 0.978).

conclusionsThere have been temporal increases in the proportion of NSTEMI and, consistent with guidelines, greater utilization of EIS. This has been accompanied by temporal decreases in in-hospital mortality and length of stay.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery BypassEarly Medical InterventionEthnicityFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionUnited Statesearly invasive strategyin‐hospital mortalitynon‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarctiontemporal trends

Identifiers

PMID25074695
PMCPMC4310389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.