Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25074611›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2014

Aquaporin-4 antibody testing: direct comparison of M1-AQP4-DNA-transfected cells with leaky scanning versus M23-AQP4-DNA-transfected cells as antigenic substrate.

Sven Jarius, Friedemann Paul, Kai Fechner, Klemens Ruprecht, Ingo Kleiter, Diego Franciotta, Marius Ringelstein, Florence Pache, Orhan Aktas, Brigitte Wildemann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Diagnostics of the neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sven JariusMolecular Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. sven.jarius@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Friedemann Paul
Kai Fechner
Klemens Ruprecht
Ingo Kleiter
Diego Franciotta
Marius Ringelstein
Florence Pache
Orhan Aktas
Brigitte Wildemann
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEEuroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika (Germany) · DEIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuromyelitis optica (NMO, Devic syndrome) is associated with antibodies to aquaporin-4 (NMO-IgG/AQP4-Ab) in the majority of cases. NMO-IgG/AQP4-Ab seropositivity in patients with NMO and its spectrum disorders has important differential diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications. So-called cell-based assays (CBA) are thought to provide the best AQP4-Ab detection rates.

objectiveTo compare directly the AQP4-IgG detection rates of the currently most widely used commercial CBA, which employs cells transfected with a full-length (M1)-human AQP4 DNA in a fashion that allows leaky scanning (LS) and thus expression of M23-AQP4 in addition to M1-AQP, to that of a newly developed CBA from the same manufacturer employing cells transfected with human M23-AQP4-DNA.

methodsResults from 368 serum samples that had been referred for routine AQP4-IgG determination and had been tested in parallel in the two assays were compared.

resultsSeventy-seven out of 368 samples (20.9%) were positive for NMO-IgG/AQP4-Ab in at least one assay. Of these, 73 (94.8%) were positive in both assays. A single sample (1.3%) was exclusively positive in the novel assay; three samples (3.9%) were unequivocally positive only in the 'classic' assay due to high background intensity in the novel assay. Both median fluorescence intensity and background intensity were higher in the new assay.

conclusionsThis large study did not reveal significant differences in AQP4-IgG detection rates between the 'classic' CBA and a new M23-DNA-based CBA. Importantly, our results largely re-affirm the validity of previous studies that had used the 'classic' AQP4-CBA to establish NMO-IgG/AQP4-Ab seropositivity rates in NMO and in a variety of NMO spectrum disorders.

Indexed as

Aquaporin 4DNAFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleNeuromyelitis OpticaProtein Array AnalysisStatistics, NonparametricTransfectionAquaporin 4DNAImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID25074611
PMCPMC4128531
OpenAlexW2117393018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.