Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25074573›Full record

ArticleHeredity2014

Systematic differences in the response of genetic variation to pedigree and genome-based selection methods.

M Heidaritabar, A Vereijken, W M Muir, T Meuwissen, H Cheng, H-J Megens, M A M Groenen, J W M Bastiaansen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

M HeidaritabarAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
A VereijkenHendrix Genetics, Research and Technology Centre, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
W M MuirDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
T MeuwissenDepartment of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
H ChengUSDA, ARS, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, MI, USA.
H-J MegensAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
M A M GroenenAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J W M BastiaansenAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLHendrix Genetics (Netherlands) · NLNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is a DNA-based method of selecting for quantitative traits in animal and plant breeding, and offers a potentially superior alternative to traditional breeding methods that rely on pedigree and phenotype information. Using a 60 K SNP chip with markers spaced throughout the entire chicken genome, we compared the impact of GS and traditional BLUP (best linear unbiased prediction) selection methods applied side-by-side in three different lines of egg-laying chickens. Differences were demonstrated between methods, both at the level and genomic distribution of allele frequency changes. In all three lines, the average allele frequency changes were larger with GS, 0.056 0.064 and 0.066, compared with BLUP, 0.044, 0.045 and 0.036 for lines B1, B2 and W1, respectively. With BLUP, 35 selected regions (empirical P < 0.05) were identified across the three lines. With GS, 70 selected regions were identified. Empirical thresholds for local allele frequency changes were determined from gene dropping, and differed considerably between GS (0.167-0.198) and BLUP (0.105-0.126). Between lines, the genomic regions with large changes in allele frequencies showed limited overlap. Our results show that GS applies selection pressure much more locally than BLUP, resulting in larger allele frequency changes. With these results, novel insights into the nature of selection on quantitative traits have been gained and important questions regarding the long-term impact of GS are raised. The rapid changes to a part of the genetic architecture, while another part may not be selected, at least in the short term, require careful consideration, especially when selection occurs before phenotypes are observed.

Indexed as

Gene FrequencyGenetic VariationModels, GeneticPedigreeAllelesAnimalsBreedingChickensFemaleGenetic DriftGenotypeMalePhenotypeSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID25074573
PMCPMC4815587
OpenAlexW2067424783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.