Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25074448›Full record

ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2014

A radial flow microfluidic device for ultra-high-throughput affinity-based isolation of circulating tumor cells.

Vasudha Murlidhar, Mina Zeinali, Svetlana Grabauskiene, Mostafa Ghannad-Rezaie, Max S Wicha, Diane M Simeone, Nithya Ramnath, Rishindra M Reddy, Sunitha Nagrath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Application of Microfluidics in Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Small extracellular vesicles in cancer.Bioactive materials · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vasudha MurlidharDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, 3074 H.H. Dow, 2300 Hayward St. Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Mina Zeinali
Svetlana Grabauskiene
Mostafa Ghannad-Rezaie
Max S Wicha
Diane M Simeone
Nithya Ramnath
Rishindra M Reddy
Sunitha Nagrath

Funding

Translational Research in GI CancerP50CA130810 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRENNER, DEAN E. · 2010 to 2016
$11.8M
Regulation of Breast Stem Cells by the MicroenvironmentR01CA101860 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WICHA, MAX S. · 2004 to 2013
$2.4M
Stem Cell Self-Renewal mammary CarcinogenesisR01CA129765 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WICHA, MAX S. · 2008 to 2015
$2.4M
Engineering sensitive microfluidic multiplex technology for isolating circulatingDP2OD006672 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NAGRATH, SUNITHA · 2009 to 2009
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA 130810NCI NIH HHS P50 CA130810NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101860NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129765NIH HHS 1DP2OD006672-01NIH HHS DP2 OD006672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are believed to play an important role in metastasis, a process responsible for the majority of cancer-related deaths. But their rarity in the bloodstream makes microfluidic isolation complex and time-consuming. Additionally the low processing speeds can be a hindrance to obtaining higher yields of CTCs, limiting their potential use as biomarkers for early diagnosis. Here, a high throughput microfluidic technology, the OncoBean Chip, is reported. It employs radial flow that introduces a varying shear profile across the device, enabling efficient cell capture by affinity at high flow rates. The recovery from whole blood is validated with cancer cell lines H1650 and MCF7, achieving a mean efficiency >80% at a throughput of 10 mL h(-1) in contrast to a flow rate of 1 mL h(-1) standardly reported with other microfluidic devices. Cells are recovered with a viability rate of 93% at these high speeds, increasing the ability to use captured CTCs for downstream analysis. Broad clinical application is demonstrated using comparable flow rates from blood specimens obtained from breast, pancreatic, and lung cancer patients. Comparable CTC numbers are recovered in all the samples at the two flow rates, demonstrating the ability of the technology to perform at high throughputs.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingBreast NeoplasmsCell CountCell Line, TumorCell SeparationCell SurvivalDimethylpolysiloxanesFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansLung NeoplasmsMCF-7 CellsMicrofluidicsPancreatic NeoplasmsShear StrengthbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanescancercancer diagnosiscirculating tumor cellshigh-throughputmicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID25074448
PMCPMC4455044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.