ReviewDer Pathologe2014
[Merkel cell carcinoma].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nationwide multidisciplinary consensus on the clinical management of Merkel cell carcinoma: a Delphi panel.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Article
- Merkel cell carcinoma.Skin health and disease · 2021Review
- Merkel cell carcinoma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017Review
- Unexpected maspin immunoreactivity in Merkel cell carcinoma.Diagnostic pathology · 2015Article
- Skin Cancer in the Crosshairs: Highlights from the Biennial Scientific Retreat of International Transplant Skin Cancer Collaborative and Skin Care in Organ Transplant Recipients Europe.Transplantation direct · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma) is a rare form of tumor of unclear histogenesis which predominantly occurs in elderly patients on areas exposed to the sun. A higher incidence and occurrence in younger people is predominantly found in immunosuppressed persons which is why a pathogenetic role is also attributed to immunosuppression in addition to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Additionally, in 80% of cases clonally integrated polyomavirus (Merkel cell polyomavirus, MCPyV) could be detected. Clinically MCC represents an uncharacteristic tumor. Histopathologically, monomorphic dermal and/or subcutaneous nodes are found consisting of round or oval medium sized cells with a vesicular nucleus and sparse cytoplasm. The neoplastic cells of MCC express cytokeratin (CK) 20 with a dot-like perinuclear accentuation. In addition, pan-CK, neuroendocrine markers (e.g. chromogranin A and synaptophysin), neurofilament proteins, CD56, CD57, Bcl-2, TdT and PAX-5 are immunohistochemically positive. In most cases CM2B4, an antibody against MCPyV is also positive. Expression of p63 has been observed in some of the cases and in some studies was associated with a favorable prognosis. The markers thyroid transcription factor 1, mammalian achaete scute complex like 1, vimentin, S-100 and CK7 are not normally expressed by MCC. The prognosis is primarily dependent on tumor size and the lymph node status. The presence of intralymphatic tumor complexes is associated with a higher rate of local recurrence and lymph node metastasis. A larger number of intratumoral cytotoxic T-lymphocytes is accompanied by a favorable prognosis and the presence of > 50% of K-67+ neoplastic cells with an unfavorable prognosis. Further morphological, phenotypical and genetic factors have not yet been validated in larger cohorts with respect to the prognostic relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.