Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25074040›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2014

Full-field electroretinogram response to increment and decrement stimuli.

Eric Vukmanic, Kate Godwin, Pan Shi, Alan Hughes, Paul DeMarco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Contrast Sensitivity of ON and OFF Human Retinal Pathways in Myopia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic On-Off ERG.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric VukmanicDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 317 Life Sciences Bldg., University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Kate Godwin
Pan Shi
Alan Hughes
Paul DeMarco

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe d-wave is typically elicited after the termination of an increment flash, but a decrement flash provides an alternative, and perhaps more appropriate, stimulus to elicit the d-wave. Here, we investigated the affects of stimulus polarity on the electroretinogram (ERG) response.

methodsERG responses elicited to increment and decrement flashes of varying intensity and duration from different background levels were measured from human participants to assess the b-wave and d-wave responses as a function of adaptation level and flash polarity. Response amplitudes were measured using standard metrics for waveform analysis.

resultsThe amplitude of the b-wave is larger than the d-wave regardless of flash polarity when using different background levels which maximized the dynamic range of the two waveforms. However, when response amplitudes are measured from a common background, the d-wave elicited with decrement flash was larger than the b-wave elicited by an increment flash. This trend was evident across a range of background levels. The b-wave and d-wave become separate entities when flash duration reaches approximately 50 ms. Rapid-on and rapid-off sawtooth stimuli were also tested against increment and decrement step stimuli that were matched in mean luminance. These two stimulus types produced different amplitude b-wave and d-wave responses, suggesting asymmetric effects of the two stimulus types on the retinal response.

conclusionsWe conclude that the response properties of the b-wave and d-wave are influenced by the duration, polarity and waveform of the stimulus, as well as the background from which the stimuli arise.

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyAdaptation, OcularAdolescentAdultHumansPhotic StimulationRetina

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.