ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2014
Full-field electroretinogram response to increment and decrement stimuli.
Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined Mouse Retinal Optoretinography/Electroretinography System to Study Light-Evoked Responses in Animal Models of Retinal Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Native components analysis of the spectral electroretinogram.Vision research · 2025Article
- Human Electroretinography Shows Little Polarity Specificity Following Full-Field Ramp Adaptation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Contrast Sensitivity of ON and OFF Human Retinal Pathways in Myopia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic On-Off ERG.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Reduction on OFF-responses of Electroretinogram in Monkeys with Long-term High Intraocular Pressure.Chinese medical journal · 2017Article
- An asymmetric outer retinal response to drifting sawtooth gratings.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe d-wave is typically elicited after the termination of an increment flash, but a decrement flash provides an alternative, and perhaps more appropriate, stimulus to elicit the d-wave. Here, we investigated the affects of stimulus polarity on the electroretinogram (ERG) response.
methodsERG responses elicited to increment and decrement flashes of varying intensity and duration from different background levels were measured from human participants to assess the b-wave and d-wave responses as a function of adaptation level and flash polarity. Response amplitudes were measured using standard metrics for waveform analysis.
resultsThe amplitude of the b-wave is larger than the d-wave regardless of flash polarity when using different background levels which maximized the dynamic range of the two waveforms. However, when response amplitudes are measured from a common background, the d-wave elicited with decrement flash was larger than the b-wave elicited by an increment flash. This trend was evident across a range of background levels. The b-wave and d-wave become separate entities when flash duration reaches approximately 50 ms. Rapid-on and rapid-off sawtooth stimuli were also tested against increment and decrement step stimuli that were matched in mean luminance. These two stimulus types produced different amplitude b-wave and d-wave responses, suggesting asymmetric effects of the two stimulus types on the retinal response.
conclusionsWe conclude that the response properties of the b-wave and d-wave are influenced by the duration, polarity and waveform of the stimulus, as well as the background from which the stimuli arise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25074040What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.