Trial reportEuropean journal of preventive cardiology2016
Differential effects of insulin sensitization and insulin provision treatment strategies on concentrations of circulating adipokines in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease in the BARI 2D trial.
Trial report in European journal of preventive cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of Adipokines in Predicting Cardiovascular Outcome: Explaining the Obesity Paradox.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2016Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo determine the effects of insulin sensitization (IS) and insulin provision (IP) treatment strategies on adipokines associated with cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial (BARI 2D). METHODS AND
resultsChanges in adipokine levels were compared in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease randomized to IS (n = 1037) versus IP (n = 1019) treatment strategies in BARI 2D. Circulating concentrations of leptin, adiponectin, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin 6 and C-reactive protein were evaluated at baseline and one year. IS and IP treatment strategies exerted significant (p < 0.0001) differential effects on: leptin (IS: 0.02% decrease, p = 0.01; IP: 13% increase, p < 0.0001); adiponectin (IS: 73% increase, p < 0.0001; IP: no change, p = 0.52); interleukin 6 (IS: 14% decrease, p < 0.0001; IP: no change, p = 0.68). Changes in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were not statistically different between groups. C-reactive protein decreased, but the effect was significantly greater in the IS group (-32%, p < 0.0001) than in the IP group (-5%, p = 0.0005).
conclusionThe IS and IP treatment strategies exerted divergent effects on adipokine and inflammatory profile in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. The IS treatment strategy-induced changes may be more favorable than the IP treatment strategy regarding cardiovascular pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.