Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25073834›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2014

Cocaine-, caffeine-, and stress-evoked cocaine reinstatement in high vs. low impulsive rats: treatment with allopregnanolone.

Paul S Regier, Alexander B Claxton, Natalie E Zlebnik, Marilyn E Carroll

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Stress-Induced Reinstatement of Drug Seeking: 20 Years of Progress.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul S RegierGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: regi0011@umn.edu.
Alexander B ClaxtonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Natalie E ZlebnikGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Marilyn E CarrollDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007234 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Paul G Mermelstein, Jocelyn M Richard · 1986 to 2026
$10.9M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING OF NEUROSCIENTISTST32GM008471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI EBNER, TIMOTHY J · 1993 to 2017
$4.9M
Vulnerability to Drug Abuse: Experimental InterventionsR01DA003240 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 1985 to 2010
$3.1M
Models for the Prevention and Treatment of Drug AbuseK05DA015267 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 2002 to 2011
$1.3M
Exercise for Treatment of Relapse: Behavior and NeurobiologyF31DA036248 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ZLEBNIK, NATALIE · 2013 to 2013
$31k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA036248NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA015267NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003240NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007234NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research indicates that individual differences in traits such as impulsivity, avidity for sweets, and novelty reactivity are predictors of several aspects of drug addiction. Specifically, rats that rank high on these behavioral measures are more likely than their low drug-seeking counterparts to exhibit several characteristics of drug-seeking behavior. In contrast, initial work suggests that the low drug-seeking animals are more reactive to negative events (e.g., punishment and anxiogenic stimuli). The goal of this study was to compare high and low impulsive rats on reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior elicited by cocaine (COC) and by negative stimuli such as the stress-inducing agent yohimbine (YOH) or a high dose of caffeine (CAFF). An additional goal was to determine whether treatment with allopregnanolone (ALLO) would reduce reinstatement (or relapse) of cocaine-seeking behavior under these priming conditions.

methodsFemale rats were selected as high (HiI) or low (LoI) impulsive using a delay-discounting task. After selection, they were allowed to self-administer cocaine for 12 days. Cocaine was then replaced with saline, and rats extinguished lever responding over 16 days. Subsequently, rats were pretreated with either vehicle control or ALLO, and cocaine seeking was reinstated by injections of COC, CAFF, or YOH.

resultsWhile there were no phenotype differences in maintenance and extinction of cocaine self-administration or reinstatement under control treatment conditions, ALLO attenuated COC- and CAFF-primed reinstatement in LoI but not HiI rats.

conclusionsOverall, the present findings suggest that individual differences in impulsive behavior may influence efficacy of interventions aimed to reduce drug-seeking behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AddictiveCaffeineCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersConditioning, OperantDelay DiscountingExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleImpulsive BehaviorPregnanoloneRatsRats, Inbred StrainsRecurrenceSelf AdministrationYohimbineCaffeineCocainePregnanoloneYohimbineAllopregnanoloneCaffeineCocaineImpulsivityReinstatementSelf-administrationYohimbine

Identifiers

PMID25073834
PMCPMC4172353
OpenAlexW1970607199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.