ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2015
Incidence and factors predicting whooping cough due to parapertussis diagnosis among patients referred to general practitioners, Poland, 2009-2011.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bordetella parapertussis outbreak in Southeastern Minnesota and the United States, 2014.Medicine · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parapertussis leads to similar symptoms as pertussis, both being caused by bacteria from the genus Bordetella. Poland does not routinely diagnose nor conduct surveillance for parapertussis. We estimated parapertussis incidence and determined predictors of parapertussis diagnosis in the Polish population. Between July 2009 and April 2011, we conducted a prospective cohort study among patients attending 78 general practices. We included patients aged ≥ 3 years, with cough lasting >2 weeks, interviewed patients and collected a nasopharyngeal swab. We confirmed cases by real-time PCR. We estimated parapertussis incidence rates by dividing the number of cases by the summed person-time of observation in respective practices. We assessed predictors of PCR-confirmed parapertussis by comparing cases with patients testing negative. Using logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). We identified 78 cases among 1,231 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The incidence rate was 39/100,000 person-years (95%CI 31-49). The highest rates (140/100,000; 95%CI 74-239), were among children 3-5 years of age and the lowest (24/100,000; 95%CI 13-40) among persons aged 20-39 years of age. Boys aged 3-5 years (7.1; 2.1-25.3) and women aged >40 years (4.1; 1.4-11.7) or living in crowded households (4.3; 1.4-12.9) or contacting persons with prolonged cough (2.3; 1.1-4.5) were more likely to be diagnosed. Our results suggest that laboratory diagnosis could be prioritized for children in the preschool age and women aged over 40 who were referred to their GP with prolonged cough. In the absence of vaccine, post-exposure prophylaxis for close contacts of parapertussis cases could an adequate preventative measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.