Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25073723›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2014

Endothelial atypical cannabinoid receptor: do we have enough evidence?

Alexander I Bondarenko

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pharmacognosy and Effects of Cannabinoids in the Vascular System.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Intracellular CaPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Direct activation of CaEuropean journal of pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alexander I BondarenkoCirculatory Physiology Department, O.O.Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kiev, Ukraine; Institute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Medical University of Graz · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 27238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabinoids and their synthetic analogues affect a broad range of physiological functions, including cardiovascular variables. Although direct evidence is still missing, the relaxation of a vast range of vascular beds induced by cannabinoids is believed to involve a still unidentified non-CB1 , non-CB2 Gi/o protein-coupled receptor located on endothelial cells, the so called endothelial cannabinoid receptor (eCB receptor). Evidence for the presence of an eCB receptor comes mainly from vascular relaxation studies, which commonly employ pertussis toxin as an indicator for GPCR-mediated signalling. In addition, a pharmacological approach is widely used to attribute the relaxation to eCB receptors. Recent findings have indicated a number of GPCR-independent targets for both agonists and antagonists of the presumed eCB receptor, warranting further investigations and cautious interpretation of the vascular relaxation studies. This review will provide a brief historical overview on the proposed novel eCB receptor, drawing attention to the discrepancies between the studies on the pharmacological profile of the eCB receptor and highlighting the Gi/o protein-independent actions of the eCB receptor inhibitors widely used as selective compounds. As the eCB receptor represents an attractive pharmacological target for a number of cardiovascular abnormalities, defining its molecular identity and the extent of its regulation of vascular function will have important implications for drug discovery. This review highlights the need to re-evaluate this subject in a thoughtful and rigorous fashion. More studies are needed to differentiate Gi/o protein-dependent endothelial cannabinoid signalling from that involving the classical CB1 and CB2 receptors as well as its relevance for pathophysiological conditions.

Indexed as

AnisolesCannabidiolCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCannabinoid Receptor AntagonistsCyclohexanesEndothelial CellsHumansPiperidinesPyrazolesReceptors, CannabinoidReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRimonabantVasodilation1,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-2-(3-methyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)benzeneAnisolesCannabidiolCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCannabinoid Receptor AntagonistsCyclohexanesPiperidinesPyrazolesReceptors, CannabinoidReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRimonabant

Identifiers

PMID25073723
PMCPMC4290703
OpenAlexW1568432828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.