Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25073446›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2014

Primary implant stability in augmented sinuslift-sites after completed bone regeneration: a randomized controlled clinical study comparing four subantrally inserted biomaterials.

Angelo Troedhan, Izabela Schlichting, Andreas Kurrek, Marcel Wainwright

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of an In Situ HardeningDentistry journal · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Angelo TroedhanHead of Maxillofacial Surgery Dep., Center for Facial Esthetics Vienna, Brauhausgasse 12, 1050 Vienna, Austria.
Izabela SchlichtingHead of Oral Surgery &Implantology Dep., Center for Facial Esthetics Vienna, Brauhausgasse 12, 1050 Vienna, Austria.
Andreas KurrekHead of Oral Surgery &Implantology Dep., Implantology Clinic Oberkassel, Dominikanerstrasse 10, 40545 Dusseldorf.
Marcel WainwrightHead of Oral Surgery &Implantology Dep., Implantology Clinic Kaiserswerth, Kaiserswerther Markt 25, 40489 Dusseldorf.
Active Implants (United States) · USAkademie für orale Implantologie · ATInstitute for Facial Esthetics · USItalian Society of Periodontology and Implantology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implant-Insertion-Torque-Value (ITV) proved to be a significant clinical parameter to predict long term implant success-rates and to decide upon immediate loading. The study evaluated ITVs, when four different and commonly used biomaterials were used in sinuslift-procedures compared to natural subantral bone in two-stage-implant-procedures. The tHUCSL-INTRALIFT-method was chosen for sinuslifting in 155 sinuslift-sites for its minimal invasive transcrestal approach and scalable augmentation volume. Four different biomaterials were inserted randomly (easy-graft CRYSTAL n = 38, easy-graft CLASSIC n = 41, NanoBone n = 42, BioOss n = 34), 2 ccm in each case. After a mean healing period of 8,92 months uniform tapered screw Q2-implants were inserted and Drill-Torque-Values (DTV) and ITV were recorded and compared to a group of 36 subantral sites without need of sinuslifting. DTV/ITV were processed for statistics by ANOVA-tests. Mean DTV/ITV obtained in Ncm were: Control Group 10,2/22,2, Bio-Oss 12,7/26,2, NanoBone 17,5/33,3, easy-graft CLASSIC 20,3/45,9, easy-graft CRYSTAL 23,8/56,6 Ncm, significance-level of differences throughout p < 0,05. Within the limits of this study the results suggest self-hardening solid-block-like bone-graft-materials to achieve significantly better DTV/ITV than loose granulate biomaterials for its suspected improvement of vascularization and mineralization of the subantral scaffold by full immobilization of the augmentation site towards pressure changes in the human sinus at normal breathing.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsDenture RetentionAdultBiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationCalcium PhosphatesDrug CombinationsDurapatiteFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaMaxillary SinusMiddle AgedMineralsSilicon Dioxidebeta-tricalcium phosphateBiocompatible MaterialsBio-OssCalcium PhosphatesDental ImplantsDrug CombinationsDurapatiteMineralsNanoBoneSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID25073446
PMCPMC5376201
OpenAlexW2031418775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.