Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology1989
Effects of simvastatin and fenofibrate on serum lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in primary hypercholesterolaemia.
Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Absolute Quantification of Apolipoproteins Following Treatment with Omega-3 Carboxylic Acids and Fenofibrate Using a High Precision Stable Isotope-labeled Recombinant Protein Fragments Based SRM Assay.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Trial
- Fenofibrate: a novel formulation (Triglide) in the treatment of lipid disorders: a review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2006Review
- Simvastatin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its cost-effectiveness in hypercholesterolaemia and prevention of coronary heart disease.PharmacoEconomics · 1992Review
- Simvastatin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in hypercholesterolaemia.Drugs · 1990Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sixteen patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia received double-blind either fenofibrate (n = 8; 200 mg bid) or the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin (n = 8; 20 mg q.p.m. [corrected] or 40 mg q.p.m. [corrected] if LDL-cholesterol did not fall below 3.6 mmol.l-1 after 4 weeks of treatment). Simvastatin reduced total cholesterol from 9.7 to 7.0 mmol.l-1 after 10 weeks (-28%), and fenofibrate reduced it from 9.2 to 7.7 mmol.l-1 (-15%). The decrease was less during fenofibrate than during simvastatin treatment (time x drug: p = 0.02). Serum LDL-cholesterol fell from 8.3 to 5.3 mmol.l-1 (-36%) during simvastatin and from 7.2 to 6.0 mmol.l-1 (-16%) during fenofibrate administration. Again, the effect of simvastatin was more pronounced than that of fenofibrate (time x drug: p = 0.03). HDL-cholesterol increased significantly from 1.1 to 1.2 mmol.l-1 (+13%) during fenofibrate administration and it did not change significantly during simvastatin. Serum triglycerides fell from 1.3 to 1.1 mmol.l-1 (-16%) during simvastatin, and even more significantly from 2.2 to 1.1 mmol.l-1 (-51%) during fenofibrate (time x drug: p = 0.002). Apolipoprotein B fell on simvastatin from 1.9 to 1.4 g.l-1 (-24%) and from 1.8 to 1.4 g.l-1 (-22%) during fenofibrate. Both drugs were well tolerated and had no significant adverse effects. Simvastatin lowered total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations more than fenofibrate, while the latter had more effect on triglycerides, suggesting specific indications for the two drugs in the treatment of hyperlipoproteinaemias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.