Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25073131›Full record

Trial reportTrends in hearing2014

The influence of sound generator associated with conventional amplification for tinnitus control: randomized blind clinical trial.

Gisele Munhoes dos Santos, Ricardo Ferreira Bento, Italo Roberto Torres de Medeiros, Jeanne Oiticcica, Eleonora Csipai da Silva, Silvio Penteado

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trends in hearing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Recent Updates on Tinnitus Management.Journal of audiology & otology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Development and Evaluation ofInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gisele Munhoes dos SantosDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Brazil giselemunhoes@gmail.com.
Ricardo Ferreira BentoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Italo Roberto Torres de MedeirosDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Jeanne OiticcicaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Eleonora Csipai da SilvaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Silvio PenteadoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing aids with an integrated sound generator have been used to enhance the treatment of tinnitus. The main aim of this study was to verify whether the combined use of amplification and sound generator is more effective than conventional amplification alone in reducing tinnitus annoyance by means of the use of a new hearing aid with an integrated sound generator. A total of 49 patients underwent a blind randomized clinical trial. Tinnitus annoyance was measured by Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and numerical scales, and psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus were also performed. The sound generator was set at the lowest intensity capable of providing relief from tinnitus. Results showed that 62.5% of the patients presented a reduction in tinnitus annoyance in the combined fitting group and in the group with amplification alone, 78% showed a reduction. This difference between the groups was not statistically significant.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionHearing AidsAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilDisability EvaluationEquipment DesignFemaleHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychoacousticsTinnitushearing aidssound generatortinnitus

Identifiers

PMID25073131
PMCPMC4222183
OpenAlexW2102221695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.