Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25072413›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2015

Exploring functional contexts of symbiotic sustain within lichen-associated bacteria by comparative omics.

Martin Grube, Tomislav Cernava, Jung Soh, Stephan Fuchs, Ines Aschenbrenner, Christian Lassek, Uwe Wegner, Dörte Becher, Katharina Riedel, Christoph W Sensen and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
45.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 274 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin GrubeInstitute of Plant Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University, Graz, Austria.
Tomislav CernavaInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Jung SohDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Stephan FuchsInstitute of Microbiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Ines Aschenbrenner1] Institute of Plant Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University, Graz, Austria [2] Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Christian LassekInstitute of Microbiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Uwe WegnerInstitute of Microbiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Dörte BecherInstitute of Microbiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Katharina RiedelInstitute of Microbiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Christoph W SensenDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gabriele BergInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Universität Greifswald · DEGraz University of Technology · ATUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Graz · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbioses represent a frequent and successful lifestyle on earth and lichens are one of their classic examples. Recently, bacterial communities were identified as stable, specific and structurally integrated partners of the lichen symbiosis, but their role has remained largely elusive in comparison to the well-known functions of the fungal and algal partners. We have explored the metabolic potentials of the microbiome using the lung lichen Lobaria pulmonaria as the model. Metagenomic and proteomic data were comparatively assessed and visualized by Voronoi treemaps. The study was complemented with molecular, microscopic and physiological assays. We have found that more than 800 bacterial species have the ability to contribute multiple aspects to the symbiotic system, including essential functions such as (i) nutrient supply, especially nitrogen, phosphorous and sulfur, (ii) resistance against biotic stress factors (that is, pathogen defense), (iii) resistance against abiotic factors, (iv) support of photosynthesis by provision of vitamin B12, (v) fungal and algal growth support by provision of hormones, (vi) detoxification of metabolites, and (vii) degradation of older parts of the lichen thallus. Our findings showed the potential of lichen-associated bacteria to interact with the fungal as well as algal partner to support health, growth and fitness of their hosts. We developed a model of the symbiosis depicting the functional multi-player network of the participants, and argue that the strategy of functional diversification in lichens supports the longevity and persistence of lichens under extreme and changing ecological conditions.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaMicrobiotaSymbiosisAscomycotaBacteriaChlorophytaLichensMetagenomeMetagenomicsPhotosynthesisProteomeProteomicsProteome

Identifiers

PMID25072413
PMCPMC4303634
OpenAlexW1984067337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.