Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25071900›Full record

ReviewGut and liver2014

Barrett's esophagus and cancer risk: how research advances can impact clinical practice.

Massimiliano di Pietro, Durayd Alzoubaidi, Rebecca C Fitzgerald

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut and liver, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02464930 (Evaluation of MicroRNA Expression in Blood and Cytology Specimens as a Novel Method for Detecting Barrett's Esophagus), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02464930 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of MicroRNA Expression in Blood and Cytology Specimens as a Novel Method for Detecting Barrett's Esophagus

TypeobservationalSponsorMidwest Biomedical ResearchRan2015 to 2018Enrolled220ConditionsBarrett's Esophagus, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. E-cigarette use and Barrett's esophagus: evaluating a new risk in the era of vaping.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systemic Diseases and Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk.Journal of cancer & allied specialties · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Oesophageal cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017
    Review
  17. Oesophageal Stem Cells and Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Surveillance in Barrett esophagus.Journal of medicine and life · 2014
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Massimiliano di PietroMRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Durayd AlzoubaidiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital, Basildon, UK.
Rebecca C FitzgeraldMRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-011Medical Research Council MC_U105365007Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), whose incidence has increased sharply in the last 4 decades. The annual conversion rate of BE to cancer is significant, but small. The identification of patients at a higher risk of cancer therefore poses a clinical conundrum. Currently, endoscopic surveillance is recommended in BE patients, with the aim of diagnosing either dysplasia or cancer at early stages, both of which are curable with minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. There is a large variation in clinical practice for endoscopic surveillance, and dysplasia as a marker of increased risk is affected by sampling error and high interobserver variability. Screening programs have not yet been formally accepted, mainly due to the economic burden that would be generated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Screening programs have not yet been formally accepted, mainly due to the economic burden that would be generated by widespread indication to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In fact, it is currently difficult to formulate an accurate algorithm to confidently target the population at risk, based on the known clinical risk factors for BE and EAC. This review will focus on the clinical and molecular factors that are involved in the development of BE and its conversion to cancer and on how increased knowledge in these areas can improve the clinical management of the disease.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsBarrett EsophagusDiagnostic ImagingDisease Models, AnimalEpigenesis, GeneticEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyForecastingGenetic MarkersHumansMicePractice Guidelines as TopicRisk FactorsGenetic MarkersBarrett esophagusCancerDysplasiaScreening

Identifiers

PMID25071900
PMCPMC4113043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.