Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25071878›Full record

ArticleStatistics in biopharmaceutical research2014

Bridging Solutions in Dose Finding Problems.

John O'Quigley, Alexia Iasonos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in biopharmaceutical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Concurrent dose-finding of a novel cancer drug with and without a second agent.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Shift models for dose-finding in partially ordered groups.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  11. The Impact of Early-Phase Trial Design in the Drug Development Process.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Designs for phase I trials in ordered groups.Statistics in medicine · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John O'QuigleyLSTA, Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI, 75005 Paris, France.
Alexia IasonosMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Designs for phase I trials of combinations of agentsR01CA142859 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI CONAWAY, MARK R · 2010 to 2017
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The idea of bridging in dose-finding studies is closely linked to the problem of group heterogeneity. There are some distinctive features in the case of bridging which need to be considered if efficient estimation of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is to be accomplished. The case of two distinct populations is considered. In the bridging setting we usually have in mind two studies, corresponding to the two populations. In some cases, the first of these studies may have been completed while the second has yet to be initiated. In other cases, the studies take place simultaneously and information can then be shared among the two groups. The methodological problem is how to make most use of the information gained in the first study to help improve efficiency in the second. We describe the models that we can use for the purpose of bridging and study situations in which their use leads to overall improvements in performance as well as cases where there is no gain when compared to carrying out parallel studies. Simulations and an example in pediatric oncology help to provide further insight.

Indexed as

BridgingCalibrationClinical trialsContinual Reassessment MethodDose escalationDose finding studiesPediatric trialsPharmacokineticsPhase 1 trialsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID25071878
PMCPMC4111208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.