Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25071817›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2014

Glyco-engineering for biopharmaceutical production in moss bioreactors.

Eva L Decker, Juliana Parsons, Ralf Reski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recombinant Protein Drugs: A 2025 Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. The Importance of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Differential prolyl hydroxylation by six Physcomitrella prolyl-4 hydroxylases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Process Engineering of Biopharmaceutical Production in Moss BioreactorsFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  9. Recombinant Spider Silk: Promises and Bottlenecks.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Unexpected Arabinosylation after Humanization of Plant ProteinFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Plant Platforms for Efficient Heterologous Protein Production.Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering : BBE · 2021
    Review
  13. Stable Protein Sialylation in Physcomitrella.Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Moss-made pharmaceuticals: from bench to bedside.Plant biotechnology journal · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva L DeckerDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Juliana ParsonsDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Ralf ReskiDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies Freiburg, Germany ; Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of recombinant biopharmaceuticals (pharmaceutical proteins) is a strongly growing area in the pharmaceutical industry. While most products to date are produced in mammalian cell cultures, namely Chinese hamster ovary cells, plant-based production systems gained increasing acceptance over the last years. Different plant systems have been established which are suitable for standardization and precise control of cultivation conditions, thus meeting the criteria for pharmaceutical production. The majority of biopharmaceuticals comprise glycoproteins. Therefore, differences in protein glycosylation between humans and plants have to be taken into account and plant-specific glycosylation has to be eliminated to avoid adverse effects on quality, safety, and efficacy of the products. The basal land plant Physcomitrella patens (moss) has been employed for the recombinant production of high-value therapeutic target proteins (e.g., Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Complement Factor H, monoclonal antibodies, Erythropoietin). Being genetically excellently characterized and exceptionally amenable for precise gene targeting via homologous recombination, essential steps for the optimization of moss as a bioreactor for the production of recombinant proteins have been undertaken. Here, we discuss the glyco-engineering approaches to avoid non-human N- and O-glycosylation on target proteins produced in moss bioreactors.

Indexed as

glycosylationmoss bioreactorPhyscomitrella patensplant-made pharmaceuticalsposttranslational modifications

Identifiers

PMID25071817
PMCPMC4089626
OpenAlexW1969484216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.