Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25071815›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2014

Damage signals in the insect immune response.

Robert Krautz, Badrul Arefin, Ulrich Theopold

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cell-death induced immune response and coagulopathy promote cachexia inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Enigmas of Tissue Closure: Inspiration fromCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Evolution of innate immunity: lessons from mammalian models shaping our current view of insect immunity.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Insights intoFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Toxins · 2023
    Article
  16. RNAi-mediated gene silencing ofFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert KrautzDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm Sweden.
Badrul ArefinDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm Sweden.
Ulrich TheopoldDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm Sweden.
Wenner-Gren Foundations · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects and mammals share an ancient innate immune system comprising both humoral and cellular responses. The insect immune system consists of the fat body, which secretes effector molecules into the hemolymph and several classes of hemocytes, which reside in the hemolymph and of protective border epithelia. Key features of wound- and immune responses are shared between insect and mammalian immune systems including the mode of activation by commonly shared microbial (non-self) patterns and the recognition of these patterns by dedicated receptors. It is unclear how metazoan parasites in insects, which lack these shared motifs, are recognized. Research in recent years has demonstrated that during entry into the insect host, many eukaryotic pathogens leave traces that alert potential hosts of the damage they have afflicted. In accordance with terminology used in the mammalian immune systems, these signals have been dubbed danger- or damage-associated signals. Damage signals are necessary byproducts generated during entering hosts either by mechanical or proteolytic damage. Here, we briefly review the current stage of knowledge on how wound closure and wound healing during mechanical damage is regulated and how damage-related signals contribute to these processes. We also discuss how sensors of proteolytic activity induce insect innate immune responses. Strikingly damage-associated signals are also released from cells that have aberrant growth, including tumor cells. These signals may induce apoptosis in the damaged cells, the recruitment of immune cells to the aberrant tissue and even activate humoral responses. Thus, this ensures the removal of aberrant cells and compensatory proliferation to replace lost tissue. Several of these pathways may have been co-opted from wound healing and developmental processes.

Indexed as

coagulationdangerhemocytesinnate immunitynematodestumor

Identifiers

PMID25071815
PMCPMC4093659
OpenAlexW1993298447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.