Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25071731›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

Inhibition of microbial sulfate reduction in a flow-through column system by (per)chlorate treatment.

Anna Engelbrektson, Christopher G Hubbard, Lauren M Tom, Aaron Boussina, Yong T Jin, Hayden Wong, Yvette M Piceno, Hans K Carlson, Mark E Conrad, Gary Anderson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Mechanism of HmBio · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna EngelbrektsonDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA, USA.
Christopher G HubbardLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth Sciences Division Berkeley, CA, USA.
Lauren M TomLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth Sciences Division Berkeley, CA, USA.
Aaron BoussinaDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA, USA.
Yong T JinDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA, USA.
Hayden WongDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA, USA.
Yvette M PicenoLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth Sciences Division Berkeley, CA, USA.
Hans K CarlsonDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA, USA.
Mark E ConradLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth Sciences Division Berkeley, CA, USA.
Gary AndersonLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth Sciences Division Berkeley, CA, USA.
John D CoatesDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA, USA ; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth Sciences Division Berkeley, CA, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USNASA Earth Science

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial sulfate reduction is a primary cause of oil reservoir souring. Here we show that amendment with chlorate or perchlorate [collectively (per)chlorate] potentially resolves this issue. Triplicate packed columns inoculated with marine sediment were flushed with coastal water amended with yeast extract and one of nitrate, chlorate, or perchlorate. Results showed that although sulfide production was dramatically reduced by all treatments, effluent sulfide was observed in the nitrate (10 mM) treatment after an initial inhibition period. In contrast, no effluent sulfide was observed with (per)chlorate (10 mM). Microbial community analyses indicated temporal community shifts and phylogenetic clustering by treatment. Nitrate addition stimulated Xanthomonadaceae and Rhizobiaceae growth, supporting their role in nitrate metabolism. (Per)chlorate showed distinct effects on microbial community structure compared with nitrate and resulted in a general suppression of the community relative to the untreated control combined with a significant decrease in sulfate reducing species abundance indicating specific toxicity. Furthermore, chlorate stimulated Pseudomonadaceae and Pseudoalteromonadaceae, members of which are known chlorate respirers, suggesting that chlorate may also control sulfidogenesis by biocompetitive exclusion of sulfate-reduction. Perchlorate addition stimulated Desulfobulbaceae and Desulfomonadaceae, which contain sulfide oxidizing and elemental sulfur-reducing species respectively, suggesting that effluent sulfide concentrations may be controlled through sulfur redox cycling in addition to toxicity and biocompetitive exclusion. Sulfur isotope analyses further support sulfur cycling in the columns, even when sulfide is not detected. This study indicates that (per)chlorate show great promise as inhibitors of sulfidogenesis in natural communities and provides insight into which organisms and respiratory processes are involved.

Indexed as

perchlorate reductionpetroleum microbiologysouringsulfate reductionsulfur

Identifiers

PMID25071731
PMCPMC4092371
OpenAlexW2145545011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.