Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25071704›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2014

The Irvine, Beatties, and Bresnahan (IBB) Forelimb Recovery Scale: An Assessment of Reliability and Validity.

Karen-Amanda Irvine, Adam R Ferguson, Kathleen D Mitchell, Stephanie B Beattie, Amity Lin, Ellen D Stuck, J Russell Huie, Jessica L Nielson, Jason F Talbott, Tomoo Inoue and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Eye tracking metrics to screen and assess cognitive impairment in patients with neurological disorders.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Karen-Amanda IrvineBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Adam R FergusonBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Kathleen D MitchellBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Stephanie B BeattieBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Amity LinBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Ellen D StuckBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
J Russell HuieBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Jessica L NielsonBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Jason F TalbottBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Tomoo InoueBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Michael S BeattieBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Jacqueline C BresnahanBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, CA , USA.

Funding

Mechanisms of secondary injury after SCIR01NS038079 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BEATTIE, MICHAEL S, BRESNAHAN, JACQUELINE C · 1999 to 2015
$5.8M
Bioinformatics For Translational Spinal Cord Injury ResearchR01NS067092 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERGUSON, ADAM R · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Cervical spinal injury and demyelination in aged ratsR21AG032518 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BEATTIE, MICHAEL S · 2009 to 2010
$346k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG032518NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038079NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS067092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The IBB scale is a recently developed forelimb scale for the assessment of fine control of the forelimb and digits after cervical spinal cord injury [SCI; (1)]. The present paper describes the assessment of inter-rater reliability and face, concurrent and construct validity of this scale following SCI. It demonstrates that the IBB is a reliable and valid scale that is sensitive to severity of SCI and to recovery over time. In addition, the IBB correlates with other outcome measures and is highly predictive of biological measures of tissue pathology. Multivariate analysis using principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrates that the IBB is highly predictive of the syndromic outcome after SCI (2), and is among the best predictors of bio-behavioral function, based on strong construct validity. Altogether, the data suggest that the IBB, especially in concert with other measures, is a reliable and valid tool for assessing neurological deficits in fine motor control of the distal forelimb, and represents a powerful addition to multivariate outcome batteries aimed at documenting recovery of function after cervical SCI in rats.

Indexed as

forelimb functional taskrecovery of functionreliabilityspinal cord injuryvalidity

Identifiers

PMID25071704
PMCPMC4083223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.