Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25071586›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2014

Kallikrein-related peptidase-4 (KLK4): role in enamel formation and revelations from ablated mice.

John D Bartlett, James P Simmer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Drug Discovery Strategies for Kallikrein-Related Peptidases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Enamel Structure Defects inBiomedicines · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. NovelJournal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. ENAM Gene Variation in Students Exposed to Different Fluoride Concentrations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A FourthFrontiers in physiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John D BartlettHarvard School of Dental Medicine Boston, MA ; Department of Mineralized Tissue Biology, The Forsyth Institute Cambridge, MA.
James P SimmerDepartment of Biological and Material Sciences, University of Michigan School of Dentistry Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Harvard University · USMaterial Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

Enamelysin Processing Mechanisms in AmelogenesisR01DE016276 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, JOHN D · 2006 to 2014
$4.4M
Functional Studies of Kallikrein 4R01DE019775 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SIMMER, JAMES P · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016276NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enamel development occurs in stages. During the secretory stage, a soft protein rich enamel layer is produced that expands to reach its final thickness. During the maturation stage, proteins are removed and the enamel matures into the hardest substance in the body. KLK4 is expressed during the transition from secretory to the maturation stage and its expression continues throughout maturation. KLK4 is a glycosylated chymotrypsin-like serine protease that cleaves enamel matrix proteins prior to their export out of the hardening enamel layer. Mutations in KLK4 can cause autosomal recessive, non-syndromic enamel malformations in humans and mice. Klk4 ablated mice initially have normal-looking teeth with enamel of full thickness. However, the enamel is soft and protein-rich. Three findings are notable from Klk4 ablated mice: first, enamel rods fall from the interrod enamel leaving behind empty holes where the enamel fractures near the underlying dentin surface. Second, the ~10,000 crystallites that normally fuse to form a solid enamel rod fail to grow together in the ablated mice and can fall out of the rods. Third, and most striking, the crystallites grow substantially in width and thickness (a- and b-axis) in the ablated mice until they almost interlock. The crystallites grow in defined enamel rods, but interlocking is prevented presumably because too much protein remains. Conventional thought holds that enamel proteins bind specifically to the sides of enamel crystals to inhibit growth in width and thickness so that the thin, ribbon-like enamel crystallites grow predominantly in length. Results from Klk4 ablated mice demonstrate that this convention requires updating. An alternative mechanism is proposed whereby enamel proteins serve to form a mold or support structure that shapes and orients the mineral ribbons as they grow in length. The remnants of this support structure must be removed by KLK4 so that the crystallites can interlock to form fully hardened enamel.

Indexed as

ameloblastinamelogeninenamel crystallitesenamel developmentenamelinenamel rodsMMP20

Identifiers

PMID25071586
PMCPMC4082239
OpenAlexW1990110292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.