Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25071503›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

Deficient approaches to human neuroimaging.

Johannes Stelzer, Gabriele Lohmann, Karsten Mueller, Tilo Buschmann, Robert Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Action execution and observation in autistic adults: A systematic review of fMRI studies.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Whole-brain, gray, and white matter time-locked functional signal changes with simple tasks and model-free analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. System neuroscience: Past, present, and future.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johannes StelzerDepartment of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany ; Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre Hvidovre, Denmark.
Gabriele LohmannDepartment of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University Hospital Tübingen Tübingen, Germany ; Magnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics Tübingen, Germany.
Karsten MuellerDepartment of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany ; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Unit, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.
Tilo BuschmannDepartment of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany ; Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig , Germany.
Robert TurnerDepartment of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany ; Department of Physics, University of Nottingham Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is the workhorse of imaging-based human cognitive neuroscience. The use of fMRI is ever-increasing; within the last 4 years more fMRI studies have been published than in the previous 17 years. This large body of research has mainly focused on the functional localization of condition- or stimulus-dependent changes in the blood-oxygenation-level dependent signal. In recent years, however, many aspects of the commonly practiced analysis frameworks and methodologies have been critically reassessed. Here we summarize these critiques, providing an overview of the major conceptual and practical deficiencies in widely used brain-mapping approaches, and exemplify some of these issues by the use of imaging data and simulations. In particular, we discuss the inherent pitfalls and shortcomings of methodologies for statistical parametric mapping. Our critique emphasizes recent reports of excessively high numbers of both false positive and false negative findings in fMRI brain mapping. We outline our view regarding the broader scientific implications of these methodological considerations and briefly discuss possible solutions.

Indexed as

brain mappingcognitive neurosciencecritical neurosciencefMRIfunctional localization

Identifiers

PMID25071503
PMCPMC4076796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.