Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25071450›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2014

J protein mutations and resulting proteostasis collapse.

Carolina Koutras, Janice E A Braun

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DnaJC7 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. DNAJC6 Mutations Disrupt Dopamine Homeostasis in Juvenile Parkinsonism-Dystonia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2020
    Article
  11. PeerJ · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. DNAJ Proteins in neurodegeneration: essential and protective factors.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolina KoutrasDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary Calgary, AB, Canada.
Janice E A BraunDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a century of intensive investigation the effective treatment of protein aggregation diseases remains elusive. Ordinarily, molecular chaperones ensure that proteins maintain their functional conformation. The appearance of misfolded proteins that aggregate implies the collapse of the cellular chaperone quality control network. That said, the cellular chaperone network is extensive and functional information regarding the detailed action of specific chaperones is not yet available. J proteins (DnaJ/Hsp40) are a family of chaperone cofactors that harness Hsc70 (heat shock cognate protein of 70 kDa) for diverse conformational cellular tasks and, as such, represent novel clinically relevant targets for diseases resulting from the disruption of proteostasis. Here we review incisive reports identifying mutations in individual J protein chaperones and the proteostasis collapse that ensues.

Indexed as

auxilinCSPαHSJ1Hsp40MrjRme-8sacsinTim14

Identifiers

PMID25071450
PMCPMC4086201
OpenAlexW2013504083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.