ArticleGlobal ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology2014
Multifaceted diversity-area relationships reveal global hotspots of mammalian species, trait and lineage diversity.
Article in Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rhododendron diversity patterns provide new insights for conserving China's montane flora.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- Temporal Dependence of the Phylogenetic Diversity-Habitat Size Relationship: Evidence from a Closed Fermentation System.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- The SLOSS debate in fragmented grasslands: A multi-dimensional biodiversity perspective.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic and Functional Biogeographic Approach for Rodent Conservation Across an Environmental Gradient in Chile.Journal of biogeography · 2025Article
- Global multifaceted biodiversity patterns, centers, and conservation needs in angiosperms.Science China. Life sciences · 2024Article
- How Biodiversity, Climate and Landscape Drive Functional Redundancy of British Butterflies.Insects · 2023Article
- Ecological network complexity scales with area.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Global distribution and conservation status of ecologically rare mammal and bird species.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Article
- Introduced herbivores restore Late Pleistocene ecological functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Assessing the utility of conserving evolutionary history.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019Article
- DAR (diversity-area relationship): Extending classic SAR (species-area relationship) for biodiversity and biogeography analyses.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Effects of patch size and basal area on avian taxonomic and functional diversity in pine forests: Implication for the influence of habitat quality on the species-area relationship.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Diversity time-period and diversity-time-area relationships exemplified by the human microbiome.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Climate-driven changes in functional biogeography of Arctic marine fish communities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Global priorities for conservation across multiple dimensions of mammalian diversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Functional Rarity: The Ecology of Outliers.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2017Review
- Integrating biogeography, threat and evolutionary data to explore extinction crisis in the taxonomic group of cycads.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo define biome-scale hotspots of phylogenetic and functional mammalian biodiversity (PD and FD, respectively) and compare them to 'classical' hotspots based on species richness (SR) only. LOCATION: Global.
methodsSR, PD & FD were computed for 782 terrestrial ecoregions using distribution ranges of 4616 mammalian species. We used a set of comprehensive diversity indices unified by a recent framework that incorporates the species relative coverage in each ecoregion. We build large-scale multifaceted diversity-area relationships to rank ecoregions according to their levels of biodiversity while accounting for the effect of area on each diversity facet. Finally we defined hotspots as the top-ranked ecoregions.
resultsWhile ignoring species relative coverage led to a relative good congruence between biome top ranked SR, PD and FD hotspots, ecoregions harboring a rich and abundantly represented evolutionary history and functional diversity did not match with top ranked ecoregions defined by species richness. More importantly PD and FD hotspots showed important spatial mismatches. We also found that FD and PD generally reached their maximum values faster than species richness as a function of area. MAIN
conclusionsThe fact that PD/FD reach faster their maximal value than SR may suggest that the two former facets might be less vulnerable to habitat loss than the latter. While this point is expected, it is the first time that it is quantified at global scale and should have important consequences in conservation. Incorporating species relative coverage into the delineation of multifaceted hotspots of diversity lead to weak congruence between SR, PD and FD hotspots. This means that maximizing species number may fail at preserving those nodes (in the phylogenetic or functional tree) that are relatively abundant in the ecoregion. As a consequence it may be of prime importance to adopt a multifaceted biodiversity perspective to inform conservation strategies at global scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.