ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
Approaches to improve quality of care in inflammatory bowel diseases.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammatory bowel disease associated knowledge in South Indian populations: rational Study.African health sciences · 2023Article
- Inflammatory bowel disease integral care units: Evaluation of a nationwide quality certification programme. The GETECCU experience.United European gastroenterology journal · 2021Article
- A Supporting System for Management of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease during COVID-19 Outbreak: Iranian Experience-Study Protocol.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2020Article
- Integrated Care Models: Optimizing Adult Ambulatory Care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Depression Predicts Prolonged Length of Hospital Stay in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2019Article
- Development, validation, and application of a novel tool to measure disease-related knowledge in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2019Article
- Improving Quality in the Care of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2018Review
- Low-Dose Computed Tomography for the Optimization of Radiation Dose Exposure in Patients with Crohn's Disease.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2018Review
- Distance to Specialist Care and Disease Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2017Article
- Variation in Care of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Patients in Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America Partners: Role of Gastroenterologist Practice Setting in Disease Outcomes and Quality Process Measures.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies across medical disciplines have shown gaps in the care recommended in evidence based guidelines and the care actually delivered. Quality improvement projects using systematic audit and feedback interventions such as quality measures, will become increasingly important tools to address these gaps in care. These gaps are also apparent in the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Multiple organizations, including the American Gastroenterology Association and the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America, have developed programs designed to implement quality measures to improve the care of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Early results show promise of improving quality, but numerous barriers remain. Gastroenterologists need to be aware of these processes to provide the highest care possible to patients with IBD. We review the existing literature on approaches to quality improvement and their potential application and barriers when applied to IBD care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.