Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25071303›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2014

Comparison of percutaneous ablation technologies in the treatment of malignant liver tumors.

Hyeon Yu, Charles T Burke

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04420026 (Study of the Contribution of Automatic Image Fusion of a Cone-beam CT Volume With Ultrasound During Percutaneous Ablation Treatment of Hepatic Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04420026 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Study of the Contribution of Automatic Image Fusion of a Cone-beam CT Volume With Ultrasound During Percutaneous Ablation Treatment of Hepatic Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2020 to 2022Enrolled44ConditionsHepatocellular CarcinomaArmsInteract Active Tracker
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Thermal Ablation of Metastatic Colon Cancer to the Liver.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Experimental measurement of microwave ablation heating pattern and comparison to computer simulations.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2017
    Article
  12. Use of cryoablation beyond the prostate.Insights into imaging · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of hepatology · 2015
    Review
  15. Observational
  16. Thermal ablation of stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyeon YuDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Charles T BurkeDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor ablation is a minimally invasive technique used to deliver chemical, thermal, electrical, or ultrasonic damage to a specific focal tumor in an attempt to achieve substantial tumor destruction or complete eradication. As the technology continues to advance, several image-guided tumor ablations have emerged to effectively manage primary and secondary malignancies in the liver. Percutaneous chemical ablation is one of the oldest and most established techniques for treating small hepatocellular carcinomas. However, this technique has been largely replaced by newer modalities including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy, cryoablation, high-intensity-focused ultrasound ablation, and irreversible electroporation. Because there exist significant differences in underlying technological bases, understanding each mechanism of action is essential for achieving desirable outcomes. In this article, the authors review the current state of each ablation method including technological and clinical considerations.

Indexed as

cryoablationhigh-intensity–focused ultrasound ablationinterventional radiologyirreversible electroporationmicrowave ablationpercutaneous chemical ablationradiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID25071303
PMCPMC4078184
OpenAlexW1969025203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.