Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25070861›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2015

Administering anticipatory medications in end-of-life care: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the community and in nursing homes.

Eleanor Wilson, Hazel Morbey, Jayne Brown, Sheila Payne, Clive Seale, Jane Seymour

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Hypnosis for Symptom Control in Cancer Patients at the End-of-Life: A Systematic Review.The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Learning from end-of-life injectable medication patient safety incidents in the community: a mixed-methods analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor WilsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Medical School, Nottingham, UK eleanor.wilson@nottingham.ac.uk.
Hazel MorbeyDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Jayne BrownSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Sheila PayneDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Clive SealeSociology and Communications, Brunel University, London, UK.
Jane SeymourSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Medical School, Nottingham, UK.
Lancaster University · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBBrunel University of London · GBDe Montfort University · GB

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-RP-11-A12557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United Kingdom, an approach to improving end-of-life care has been the introduction of 'just in case' or 'anticipatory' medications. Nurses are often responsible for deciding when to use anticipatory medications, but little is known about their experiences.

aimTo examine nurses' decisions, aims and concerns when using anticipatory medications.

designAn ethnographic study in two UK regions, using observations and interviews with nurses working in community and nursing home teams (n = 8).

findingsObservations (n = 83) and interviews (n = 61) with community nurses. Nurses identified four 'conditions' that needed to be established before they implemented anticipatory medications: (1) irreversibility; (2) inability to take oral medication; (3) where the patient was able, they should consent and (4) decision had to be independent of demands or requests from patient's relatives. By using anticipation medications, nurses sought to enable patients to be 'comfortable and settled' by provision of gradual relief of symptoms at the lowest dose possible. They aimed to respond quickly to needs, seeking to avoid hospital admission or medical call-out, while adhering to local prescribing policies. Worries included distinguishing between pain and agitation, balancing risks of under- and over-medication and the possibility of hastening death.

conclusionNurses take a leading role in the administration of anticipatory medications. Nurses apply consideration and caution to the administration of anticipatory medications but some experience emotional burden. Education, training and experience played a role in the nurses' confidence and should continue to be central to efforts to improving the quality of palliative care in the community and nursing homes.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsNursing HomesAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePractice Patterns, Nurses'Qualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementTerminal CareAnticipatory medicationcommunity nursingdecision-makingend of life‘just in case’nursing homesplace of deathqualitativesymptom management

Identifiers

PMID25070861
PMCPMC4266693
OpenAlexW2108551969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.