Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25070510›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

Long-term asymmetrical acceleration of protein evolution after gene duplication.

Oriol Pich I Roselló, Fyodor A Kondrashov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Autophagy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. New Genes and Functional Innovation in Mammals.Genome biology and evolution · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oriol Pich I RosellóFacultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), SpainBioinformatics and Genomics Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, SpainUniversitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Fyodor A KondrashovBioinformatics and Genomics Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, SpainUniversitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, SpainInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain fyodor.kondrashov@crg.es.

Funding

European Research Council 335980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid divergence of gene copies after duplication is thought to determine the fate of the copies and evolution of novel protein functions. However, data on how long the gene copies continue to experience an elevated rate of evolution remain scarce. Standard theory of gene duplications based on some level of genetic redundancy of gene copies predicts that the period of accelerated evolution must end relatively quickly. Using a maximum-likelihood approach we estimate preduplication, initial postduplication, and recent postduplication rates of evolution that occurred in the mammalian lineage. We find that both gene copies experience a similar in magnitude acceleration in their rate of evolution. The copy located in the original genomic position typically returns to the preduplication rates of evolution in a short period of time. The burst of faster evolution of the copy that is located in a new genomic position typically lasts longer. Furthermore, the fast-evolving copies on average continue to evolve faster than the preduplication rates far longer than predicted by standard theory of gene duplications. We hypothesize that the prolonged elevated rates of evolution are determined by functional properties that were acquired during, or soon after, the gene duplication event.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationAnimalsGenomeHumansProteinsSelection, GeneticProteinsevolutiongene duplicationselection

Identifiers

PMID25070510
PMCPMC4159008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.