Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25070432›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2014

Tracking S4 movement by gating pore currents in the bacterial sodium channel NaChBac.

Tamer M Gamal El-Din, Todd Scheuer, William A Catterall

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Voltage sensors.Molecular pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pathogenic gating pore current conducted by autism-related mutations in the NaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Autism-associated mutations in KProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Illuminating spatial A-to-I RNA editing signatures within theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Voltage and pH sensing by the voltage-gated proton channel, HJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  16. Structures of closed and open states of a voltage-gated sodium channel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  17. Hysteresis in voltage-gated channels.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tamer M Gamal El-DinDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Todd ScheuerDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
William A CatterallDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 wcatt@uw.edu.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Structural Basis for Antiarrhythmic Drug ActionR01HL112808 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZHENG, NING · 2012 to 2025
$7.8M
VOLTAGE-SENSITIVE SODIUM CHANNELS IN BRAINR01NS015751 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CATTERALL, WILLIAM A · 1985 to 2018
$6.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL112808NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS015751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voltage-gated sodium channels mediate the initiation and propagation of action potentials in excitable cells. Transmembrane segment S4 of voltage-gated sodium channels resides in a gating pore where it senses the membrane potential and controls channel gating. Substitution of individual S4 arginine gating charges (R1-R3) with smaller amino acids allows ionic currents to flow through the mutant gating pore, and these gating pore currents are pathogenic in some skeletal muscle periodic paralysis syndromes. The voltage dependence of gating pore currents provides information about the transmembrane position of the gating charges as S4 moves in response to membrane potential. Here we studied gating pore current in mutants of the homotetrameric bacterial sodium channel NaChBac in which individual arginine gating charges were replaced by cysteine. Gating pore current was observed for each mutant channel, but with different voltage-dependent properties. Mutating the first (R1C) or second (R2C) arginine to cysteine resulted in gating pore current at hyperpolarized membrane potentials, where the channels are in resting states, but not at depolarized potentials, where the channels are activated. Conversely, the R3C gating pore is closed at hyperpolarized membrane potentials and opens with channel activation. Negative conditioning pulses revealed time-dependent deactivation of the R3C gating pore at the most hyperpolarized potentials. Our results show sequential voltage dependence of activation of gating pore current from R1 to R3 and support stepwise outward movement of the substituted cysteines through the narrow portion of the gating pore that is sealed by the arginine side chains in the wild-type channel. This pattern of voltage dependence of gating pore current is consistent with a sliding movement of the S4 helix through the gating pore. Through comparison with high-resolution models of the voltage sensor of bacterial sodium channels, these results shed light on the structural basis for pathogenic gating pore currents in periodic paralysis syndromes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacillusBacterial ProteinsCell LineIon Channel GatingMembrane PotentialsMothsMutagenesisPatch-Clamp TechniquesSodium ChannelsBacterial ProteinsNaChBac protein, bacteriaSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID25070432
PMCPMC4113903
OpenAlexW2163706259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.