Trial reportTrials2014
Introducing rapid diagnostic tests for malaria into drug shops in Uganda: design and implementation of a cluster randomized trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01194557 (Introducing Rapid Diagnostic Tests Into the Private Health Sector in Uganda), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Introducing Rapid Diagnostic Tests Into the Private Health Sector in Uganda: a Randomised Trial Among Registered Drug Shops to Evaluate Impact on Antimalarial Drug Use
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of introducing malaria diagnostic testing in drug shops: A cluster-randomised trial in Uganda.PloS one · 2017Trial
- Introducing rapid diagnostic tests for malaria into registered drug shops in Uganda: lessons learned and policy implications.Malaria journal · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Private sector antimalarial sales a decade after "test and treat": A cross-sectional study of drug shop clients in rural Uganda.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: a scattered picture.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2021Review
- Targeting the C-Terminal Domain Small Phosphatase 1.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Social innovation in diagnostics: three case studies.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2020Review
- Article
- A scoping review on the field validation and implementation of rapid diagnostic tests for vector-borne and other infectious diseases of poverty in urban areas.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2018Article
- The Burden of Adverse Drug Reactions Due to Artemisinin-Based Antimalarial Treatment in Selected Ugandan Health Facilities: An Active Follow-Up Study.Drug safety · 2018Observational
- Private sector role, readiness and performance for malaria case management in Uganda, 2015.Malaria journal · 2017Article
- Article
- Considerations for an Access-Centered Design of the Fever Thermometer in Low-Resource Settings: A Literature Review.JMIR human factors · 2017Review
- Introducing rapid tests for malaria into the retail sector: what are the unintended consequences?BMJ global health · 2017Article
- Examining Intervention Design: Lessons from the Development of Eight Related Malaria Health Care Intervention Studies.Health systems and reform · 2016Article
- Design, implementation and evaluation of a training programme for school teachers in the use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests as part of a basic first aid kit in southern Malawi.BMC public health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn intervention was designed to introduce rapid diagnostics tests for malaria (mRDTs) into registered drug shops in Uganda to encourage rational and appropriate treatment of malaria with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). We conducted participatory training of drug shop vendors and implemented supporting interventions to orientate local communities (patients) and the public sector (health facility staff and district officials) to the behavioral changes in diagnosis, treatment and referral being introduced in drug shops. The intervention was designed to be evaluated through a cluster randomized trial. In this paper, we present detailed design, implementation and evaluation experiences in order to help inform future studies of a complex nature.
methodsThree preparatory studies (formative, baseline and willingness-to-pay) were conducted to explore perceptions on diagnosis and treatment of malaria at drug shops, and affordable prices for mRDTs and ACTs in order to inform the design of the intervention and implementation modalities. The intervention required careful design with the intention to be acceptable, sustainable and effective. Critical components of intervention were: community sensitization and creating awareness, training of drug shop vendors to diagnose malaria with mRDTs, treat and refer customers to formal health facilities, giving pre-referral rectal artesunate and improved record-keeping. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving appropriately-targeted treatment with ACT, evaluated against microscopy on a research blood slide.
resultsIntroducing mRDTs in drug shops may seem simple, but our experience of intervention design, conduct and evaluation showed this to be a complex process requiring multiple interventions and evaluation components drawing from a combination of epidemiological, social science and health economics methodologies. The trial was conducted in phases sequenced such that each benefited from the other.
conclusionsThe main challenges in designing this trial were maintaining a balance between a robust intervention to support effective behaviour change and introducing practices that would be sustainable in a real-life situation in tropical Africa; as well as achieving a detailed evaluation without inadvertently influencing prescribing behaviour.
trial registrationNCT01194557 registered with ClinicalTrials.gov 2 September 2010.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.