Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25069975›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Introducing rapid diagnostic tests for malaria into drug shops in Uganda: design and implementation of a cluster randomized trial.

Anthony K Mbonye, Pascal Magnussen, Clare I R Chandler, Kristian S Hansen, Sham Lal, Bonnie Cundill, Caroline A Lynch, Siân E Clarke

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01194557 (Introducing Rapid Diagnostic Tests Into the Private Health Sector in Uganda), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01194557 nacompletednot on this map

Introducing Rapid Diagnostic Tests Into the Private Health Sector in Uganda: a Randomised Trial Among Registered Drug Shops to Evaluate Impact on Antimalarial Drug Use

TypeinterventionalSponsorDBL -Institute for Health Research and DevelopmentRan2010 to 2012Enrolled2,600ConditionsFever, Malaria, Diagnosis, ReferralArmsRapid diagnostic test, Lumartem
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Social innovation in diagnostics: three case studies.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anthony K MbonyeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University and Ministry of Health, Box 7272, Plot 6 Lourdel Street Nakasero, Kampala, Uganda. vpadmn@infocom.co.ug.
Pascal Magnussen
Clare I R Chandler
Kristian S Hansen
Sham Lal
Bonnie Cundill
Caroline A Lynch
Siân E Clarke
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of London · GBMinistry of Health · UGUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Wellcome Trust 084933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn intervention was designed to introduce rapid diagnostics tests for malaria (mRDTs) into registered drug shops in Uganda to encourage rational and appropriate treatment of malaria with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). We conducted participatory training of drug shop vendors and implemented supporting interventions to orientate local communities (patients) and the public sector (health facility staff and district officials) to the behavioral changes in diagnosis, treatment and referral being introduced in drug shops. The intervention was designed to be evaluated through a cluster randomized trial. In this paper, we present detailed design, implementation and evaluation experiences in order to help inform future studies of a complex nature.

methodsThree preparatory studies (formative, baseline and willingness-to-pay) were conducted to explore perceptions on diagnosis and treatment of malaria at drug shops, and affordable prices for mRDTs and ACTs in order to inform the design of the intervention and implementation modalities. The intervention required careful design with the intention to be acceptable, sustainable and effective. Critical components of intervention were: community sensitization and creating awareness, training of drug shop vendors to diagnose malaria with mRDTs, treat and refer customers to formal health facilities, giving pre-referral rectal artesunate and improved record-keeping. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving appropriately-targeted treatment with ACT, evaluated against microscopy on a research blood slide.

resultsIntroducing mRDTs in drug shops may seem simple, but our experience of intervention design, conduct and evaluation showed this to be a complex process requiring multiple interventions and evaluation components drawing from a combination of epidemiological, social science and health economics methodologies. The trial was conducted in phases sequenced such that each benefited from the other.

conclusionsThe main challenges in designing this trial were maintaining a balance between a robust intervention to support effective behaviour change and introducing practices that would be sustainable in a real-life situation in tropical Africa; as well as achieving a detailed evaluation without inadvertently influencing prescribing behaviour.

trial registrationNCT01194557 registered with ClinicalTrials.gov 2 September 2010.

Indexed as

Research DesignAntimalarialsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMalariaUgandaAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID25069975
PMCPMC4125706
OpenAlexW2118616084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.