Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25069952›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2014

Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life.

Yi Tian Wang, Terry P Haines, Paul Ritchie, Craig Walker, Teri A Ansell, Danielle T Ryan, Phaik-Sim Lim, Sanjiv Vij, Rebecca Acs, Nigel Fealy and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Physiotherapy interventions in the ICU : Outcome-relevant measurement parameters].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017
    Review
  19. [Algorithms for early mobilization in intensive care units].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yi Tian Wang
Terry P Haines
Paul Ritchie
Craig Walker
Teri A Ansell
Danielle T Ryan
Phaik-Sim Lim
Sanjiv Vij
Rebecca Acs
Nigel Fealy
Elizabeth H Skinner
Monash Health · AUDandenong Hospital · AUAustin Health · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite studies demonstrating benefit, patients with femoral vascular catheters placed for continuous renal replacement therapy are frequently restricted from mobilization. No researchers have reported filter pressures during mobilization, and it is unknown whether mobilization is safe or affects filter lifespan. Our objective in this study was to test the safety and feasibility of mobilization in this population.

methodsA total of 33 patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy via femoral, subclavian or internal jugular vascular access catheters at two general medical-surgical intensive care units in Australia were enrolled. Patients underwent one of three levels of mobilization intervention as appropriate: (1) passive bed exercises, (2) sitting on the bed edge or (3) standing and/or marching. Catheter dislodgement, haematoma and bleeding during and following interventions were evaluated. Filter pressure parameters and lifespan (hours), nursing workload and concern were also measured.

resultsNo episodes of filter occlusion or failure occurred during any of the interventions. No adverse events were detected. The intervention filters lasted longer than the nonintervention filters (regression coefficient = 13.8 (robust 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.0 to 22.6), P = 0.003). In sensitivity analyses, we found that filter life was longer in patients who had more position changes (regression coefficient = 2.0 (robust 95% CI = 0.6 to 3.5), P = 0.007). The nursing workloads between the intervention shift and the following shift were similar.

conclusionsMobilization during renal replacement therapy via a vascular catheter in patients who are critically ill is safe and may increase filter life. These findings have significant implications for the current mobility restrictions imposed on patients with femoral vascular catheters for renal replacement therapy.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000733976 (registered 13 July 2011).

Indexed as

Patient SafetyVascular Access DevicesCritical CareEarly AmbulationFemaleFiltrationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRenal Replacement TherapyStatistics, NonparametricVictoria

Identifiers

PMID25069952
PMCPMC4262200
OpenAlexW2158600256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.