ReviewNature reviews. Urology2014
The safety of testosterone supplementation therapy in prostate cancer.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Testosterone Supplementation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Pooled it
- Trends in Testosterone Therapy use in Prostate Cancer Survivors in the United States.The journal of sexual medicine · 2021Article
- Testosterone Therapy in Relation to Prostate Cancer in a U.S. Commercial Insurance Claims Database.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020Article
- The Role of Testosterone Therapy in the Setting of Prostate Cancer.Current urology reports · 2018Review
- Testosterone therapy and prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2016Review
- Prevalence of Hypogonadism in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Survivors.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with prostate cancer can present with hypogonadism and experience health and quality-of-life declines related to low testosterone levels. Despite generations of urological dogma suggesting that testosterone supplementation therapy (TST) for hypogonadism causes prostate-cancer progression, a review of the contemporary literature provides evidence to the contrary. The prostate saturation model suggests that the androgen receptor (AR) is saturated at serum testosterone levels of 150-200 ng/dl, and that additional serum testosterone above this level has limited, if any, effects within the prostate. Indeed, studies in the modern era of PSA assessments indicate that TST does not affect prostate size, intraprostatic testosterone levels, or prostate-cancer progression, provided the baseline serum testosterone level is greater than this AR saturation point. However, the body of data on this subject comes from a small number of cases, and TST should only be administered to patients with prostate cancer after thorough discussions of the risks and benefits, with subsequent careful monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.