Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25069669›Full record

SynthesisHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2014

Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Keith M Diaz, Rikki M Tanner, Louise Falzon, Emily B Levitan, Kristi Reynolds, Daichi Shimbo, Paul Muntner

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, brain MRI measures, and cognition in non-demented older adults.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keith M DiazFrom the Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (K.M.D., L.F., D.S.); Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (R.M.T., E.B.L., P.M.); and Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA (K.R.). kd2442@columbia.edu.
Rikki M TannerFrom the Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (K.M.D., L.F., D.S.); Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (R.M.T., E.B.L., P.M.); and Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA (K.R.).
Louise FalzonFrom the Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (K.M.D., L.F., D.S.); Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (R.M.T., E.B.L., P.M.); and Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA (K.R.).
Emily B LevitanFrom the Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (K.M.D., L.F., D.S.); Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (R.M.T., E.B.L., P.M.); and Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA (K.R.).
Kristi ReynoldsFrom the Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (K.M.D., L.F., D.S.); Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (R.M.T., E.B.L., P.M.); and Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA (K.R.).
Daichi ShimboFrom the Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (K.M.D., L.F., D.S.); Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (R.M.T., E.B.L., P.M.); and Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA (K.R.).
Paul MuntnerFrom the Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (K.M.D., L.F., D.S.); Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (R.M.T., E.B.L., P.M.); and Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA (K.R.).
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

WORKSITE BLOOD PRESSURE STUDYP01HL047540 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SCHWARTZ, JOSEPH E · 1993 to 2014
$27.7M
University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARBARA A GOWER · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL047540NHLBI NIH HHS P01-HL047540NHLBI NIH HHS P01-HL047540-19S1NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure (BP) has been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in some but not all studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between visit-to-visit variability of BP and CVD and all-cause mortality. Medical databases were searched through June 4, 2014, for studies meeting the following eligibility criteria: adult participants; BP measurements at ≥3 visits; follow-up for CVD, coronary heart disease, stroke, or mortality outcomes; events confirmed via database, death certificate, or event ascertainment committee; and adjustment for confounders. Data were extracted by 2 reviewers and pooled using a random-effects model. Overall, 8870 abstracts were identified of which 37 studies, representing 41 separate cohorts, met inclusion criteria. Across studies, visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP and diastolic BP showed significant associations with outcomes in 181 of 312 (58.0%) and 61 of 188 (32.4%) analyses, respectively. Few studies provided sufficient data for pooling risk estimates. For each 5 mm Hg higher SD of systolic BP, the pooled hazard ratio for stroke across 7 cohorts was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.28), for coronary heart disease across 4 cohorts was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.07-1.51), for CVD across 5 cohorts was 1.12 (95% CI, 0.98-1.28), for CVD mortality across 5 cohorts was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.09-1.35), and for all-cause mortality across 4 cohorts was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.05-1.36). In summary, modest associations between visit-to-visit variability of BP and CVD and all-cause mortality are present in published studies. However, these findings are limited by the small amount of data available for meta-analysis.

Indexed as

MortalityOffice VisitsBlood PressureBlood Pressure MonitorsCardiovascular DiseasesCoronary DiseaseFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceRisk FactorsStrokeSurvival Rateblood pressurecardiovascular diseasesmeta-analysismortalityreview

Identifiers

PMID25069669
PMCPMC4217251
OpenAlexW2098347929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.