Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25069627›Full record

Observational studyPaediatric anaesthesia2014

Pain management following major intracranial surgery in pediatric patients: a prospective cohort study in three academic children's hospitals.

Lynne G Maxwell, George M Buckley, Sapna R Kudchadkar, Elizabeth Ely, Emily L Stebbins, Christine Dube, Athir Morad, Ebaa A Jastaniah, Navil F Sethna, Myron Yaster

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Regional scalp block for post-craniotomy pain management in children: a scoping review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) as a monitor of peri-operative nociception-antinociception balance in paediatric craniotomies: a prospective observational study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Postcraniotomy Headache: Etiologies and Treatments.Current pain and headache reports · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lynne G MaxwellDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
George M Buckley
Sapna R Kudchadkar
Elizabeth Ely
Emily L Stebbins
Christine Dube
Athir Morad
Ebaa A Jastaniah
Navil F Sethna
Myron Yaster
Johns Hopkins University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (KL2)KL2RR025006 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$12.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079NCRR NIH HHS 5KL2RR025006NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPain management following major intracranial surgery is often limited by a presumed lack of need and a concern that opioids will adversely affect postoperative outcome and interfere with the neurologic examination. Nevertheless, evidence in adults is accumulating that these patients suffer moderate to severe pain, and this pain is often under-treated. The purpose of this prospective, clinical observational cohort study was to assess the incidence of pain, prescribed analgesics, methods of analgesic delivery, and patient/parent satisfaction in pediatric patients undergoing cranial surgery at three major university children's hospitals.

methodsAfter obtaining IRB and parental consent (and when applicable, patient assent), children who underwent cranial surgery for cancer, epilepsy, vascular malformations, and craniofacial reconstruction were studied. Neither intraoperative anesthetic management nor postoperative pain management was standardized, but were based on institutional routine. Patients were evaluated daily by a study investigator and by chart review for pain scores using age appropriate, validated tools (FLACC, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, Wong-Baker Faces Scale or Self-Report on a 0-10 scale), for patient/parent satisfaction using a subset of the NRC Picker satisfaction tool and in adolescents a modified QoR-40, and for the frequency, mode of administration, and type of analgesic provided. Finally, the incidence of opioid-induced side effects, specifically nausea, vomiting, pruritus, altered level of consciousness, and need for emergency diagnostic radiologic studies for altered neurologic examination were recorded. Data are provided as mean ± SD.

resultsTwo hundred children (98:102 M:F), averaging 7.8 ± 5.8 years old (range 2 months-18.5 years) and 32.2 ± 23.0 kg (range 4.5-111.6 kg) undergoing craniectomy (51), craniotomy (96), and craniofacial reconstruction (53) were studied. Despite considerable variation in mode and route of analgesic administration, there were no differences in average pain score, length of hospital stay, or parental satisfaction with care. Interestingly, opioid-induced side effects were not related to total daily opioid consumption, site of surgery, or method of opioid delivery. The most common side effect was vomiting. No patient developed respiratory depression or altered mental status secondary to analgesic therapy. Regardless of age or procedure, once eating, most patients were treated with oral oxycodone and/or acetaminophen.

conclusionsDespite considerable variation in modality and route of analgesic administration, there were no differences in average pain score, length of stay, or parental satisfaction with care. Pain scores were low, side effects were minimal, and parental satisfaction was high, providing equipoise for future blinded prospective randomized trials in this patient population.

Indexed as

CraniotomyAdolescentAnalgesicsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDrug Administration RoutesFemaleHospitals, PediatricHospitals, TeachingHumansInfantLength of StayMalePain ManagementPain MeasurementAnalgesicsanalgesiacraniotomyopioidpain controlpediatric pain

Identifiers

PMID25069627
PMCPMC4184973
OpenAlexW1996364227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.