Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25068665›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychology2015

Memory for items and relationships among items embedded in realistic scenes: disproportionate relational memory impairments in amnesia.

Deborah E Hannula, Daniel Tranel, John S Allen, Brenda A Kirchhoff, Allison E Nickel, Neal J Cohen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Visual short-term memory binding deficit in familial Alzheimer's disease.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Remembering Preservation in Hippocampal Amnesia.Annual review of psychology · 2016
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Deborah E HannulaDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Daniel TranelDepartment of Psychology, University of Iowa.
John S AllenDornsife Cognitive Neuroscience Imaging Center and Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California.
Brenda A KirchhoffDepartment of Psychology, Saint Louis University.
Allison E NickelDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Neal J CohenDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USSaint Louis University · ESUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

THE NEUROANATOMICAL ORGANIZATION OF AUDITORY-RELATED CORTICES IN THE MONKEYP01NS019632 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ADOLPHS, RALPH · 1985 to 2007
$9.1M
The Hippocampal System and Relational(Declarative) Memory ProcessesR01MH062500 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI COHEN, NEAL J. · 2002 to 2015
$5.8M
Drug Abuse, Social Decision-Making, and Sex-Related Functional Brain AsymmetryR01DA022549 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI TRANEL, DANIEL T. · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022549NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH062500NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS019632NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS19632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the dependence of item memory and relational memory on medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures. Patients with amnesia, who either had extensive MTL damage or damage that was relatively restricted to the hippocampus, were tested, as was a matched comparison group. Disproportionate relational memory impairments were predicted for both patient groups, and those with extensive MTL damage were also expected to have impaired item memory.

methodParticipants studied scenes, and were tested with interleaved 2-alternative forced-choice probe trials. Probe trials were either presented immediately after the corresponding study trial (Lag 1), 5 trials later (Lag 5), or 9 trials later (Lag 9) and consisted of the studied scene along with a manipulated version of that scene in which 1 item was replaced with a different exemplar (item memory test) or was moved to a new location (relational memory test). Participants were to identify the exact match of the studied scene.

resultsAs predicted, patients were disproportionately impaired on the test of relational memory. Item memory performance was marginally poorer among patients with extensive MTL damage, but both groups were impaired relative to matched comparison participants. Impaired performance was evident at all lags, including the shortest possible lag (Lag 1).

conclusionsThe results are consistent with the proposed role of the hippocampus in relational memory binding and representation, even at short delays, and suggest that the hippocampus may also contribute to successful item memory when items are embedded in complex scenes.

Indexed as

HippocampusMemoryTemporal LobeAdultAmnesiaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersMiddle AgedNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID25068665
PMCPMC4286539
OpenAlexW2333386391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.