Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25068490›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in toxicology2014

Improving the risk assessment of lipophilic persistent environmental chemicals in breast milk.

Geniece M Lehmann, Marc-André Verner, Bryan Luukinen, Cara Henning, Sue Anne Assimon, Judy S LaKind, Eva D McLanahan, Linda J Phillips, Matthew H Davis, Christina M Powers and 19 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New Approach Methodologies for Exposure Science.Current opinion in toxicology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Endocrine Disruptors and Obesity.Current obesity reports · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Geniece M LehmannOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park, NC , USA.
Marc-André Verner
Bryan Luukinen
Cara Henning
Sue Anne Assimon
Judy S LaKind
Eva D McLanahan
Linda J Phillips
Matthew H Davis
Christina M Powers
Erin P Hines
Sami Haddad
Matthew P Longnecker
Michael T Poulsen
David G Farrer
Satori A Marchitti
Yu-Mei Tan
Jeffrey C Swartout
Sharon K Sagiv
Clement Welsh
Jerry L Campbell
Warren G Foster
Raymond S H Yang
Suzanne E Fenton
Rogelio Tornero-Velez
Bettina M Francis
John B Barnett
Hisham A El-Masri
Jane Ellen Simmons

Funding

Mammary Gland as a Sensitive End Point to Effects of Endocrine DisruptorsZIAES102785 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FENTON, SUZANNE · 2010 to 2021
$38.1M
Human Health Effects Of Exposure To Organochlorine CompoundsZIAES049016 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LONGNECKER, MATTHEW · 2009 to 2015
$1.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES049016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipophilic persistent environmental chemicals (LPECs) have the potential to accumulate within a woman's body lipids over the course of many years prior to pregnancy, to partition into human milk, and to transfer to infants upon breastfeeding. As a result of this accumulation and partitioning, a breastfeeding infant's intake of these LPECs may be much greater than his/her mother's average daily exposure. Because the developmental period sets the stage for lifelong health, it is important to be able to accurately assess chemical exposures in early life. In many cases, current human health risk assessment methods do not account for differences between maternal and infant exposures to LPECs or for lifestage-specific effects of exposure to these chemicals. Because of their persistence and accumulation in body lipids and partitioning into breast milk, LPECs present unique challenges for each component of the human health risk assessment process, including hazard identification, dose-response assessment, and exposure assessment. Specific biological modeling approaches are available to support both dose-response and exposure assessment for lactational exposures to LPECs. Yet, lack of data limits the application of these approaches. The goal of this review is to outline the available approaches and to identify key issues that, if addressed, could improve efforts to apply these approaches to risk assessment of lactational exposure to these chemicals.

Indexed as

Maternal ExposureRisk AssessmentAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHumansMilk, HumanModels, TheoreticalMonte Carlo MethodPregnancyRatsResearch DesignEnvironmental PollutantschildrenexposurePBT chemicalspersistent organic pollutantsPOPsresearch needsrisk assessmentuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID25068490
PMCPMC4115797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.