Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25068471›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of clinical oncology2016

Treatment-related Hypertension as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for the Efficacy of Bevacizumab in Advanced Pancreas Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Prospective Trials of Gemcitabine-based Therapy With Bevacizumab.

Shubham Pant, Ludmila K Martin, Susan Geyer, Lai Wei, Katherine Van Loon, Nili Sommovilla, Mark Zalupski, Renuka Iyer, David Fogelman, Andrew H Ko and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New targeted therapies in pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shubham Pant*Department of Oncology, Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City, OK †Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH ‡Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA §Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, New York ¶Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY ∥1500 E Medical Center Dr, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI #MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ludmila K Martin
Susan Geyer
Lai Wei
Katherine Van Loon
Nili Sommovilla
Mark Zalupski
Renuka Iyer
David Fogelman
Andrew H Ko
Tanios Bekaii-Saab
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USOklahoma City University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USWarde Medical Laboratory · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhase III studies of bevacizumab in advanced pancreas cancer (APCA) demonstrated no improvement in outcome. No validated biomarkers for bevacizumab efficacy exist. We evaluated bevacizumab-related hypertension (B-HTN) as a biomarker in APCA patients in a pooled analysis from 4 prospective clinical trials of gemcitabine-based therapy combined with bevacizumab. MATERIALS AND

methodsData were collected from individual databases from 4 prospective, single-arm phase II trials. Patients were grouped according to B-HTN or no hypertension (HTN), and patients with HTN were further grouped according to highest Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade of HTN: grade 1-2 or grade 3-4. Clinical outcomes of overall survival, time to progression, overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (ORR+SD>16 wk) were compared.

resultsA total of 163 patients with stage IV APCA and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1 were included. Median age was 59 years (range, 33 to 85 y). Thirty-four patients had B-HTN, and 129 patients had no HTN. Prognostic factors were balanced between groups. Patients with any grade B-HTN had a significantly improved median overall survival (13.1 vs. 8.1 mo, P=0.0006), median time to tumor progression (7.6 vs. 5.5 mo, P=0.0074), ORR (47% vs. 16%, P=0.0001), and disease control rate (85% vs. 59%, P=0.004). There were no differences in outcomes according to HTN grade (1-2 [N=16] vs. 3-4 [N=18]).

conclusionsAPCA patients who develop any grade of B-HTN appear to derive benefit from bevacizumab. Additional investigation is needed to identify subgroups of patients who develop B-HTN and are more likely to benefit from bevacizumab.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBiomarkersDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGemcitabineHumansHypertensionKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabBiomarkersDeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID25068471
PMCPMC4305484
OpenAlexW2058533374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.