Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25068290›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental rheumatology

Novel assessment tools to evaluate clinical and laboratory responses in a subset of patients enrolled in the Rituximab in Myositis trial.

Lisa G Rider, Adrienne L Yip, Iren Horkayne-Szakaly, Rita Volochayev, Joseph A Shrader, Maria L Turner, Heidi H Kong, Minal S Jain, Anna V Jansen, Chester V Oddis and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental rheumatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Off-Label Uses of Rituximab in Dermatology.Current dermatology reports · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Update on outcome assessment in myositis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2018
    Review
  8. Current perspective on rituximab in rheumatic diseases.Drug design, development and therapy · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa G RiderEnvironmental Autoimmunity Group, Program of Clinical Research, NIEHS, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, MD, USA. riderl@mail.nih.gov.
Adrienne L Yip
Iren Horkayne-Szakaly
Rita Volochayev
Joseph A Shrader
Maria L Turner
Heidi H Kong
Minal S Jain
Anna V Jansen
Chester V Oddis
Thomas A Fleisher
Frederick W Miller
United States Department of Health and Human Services · US

Funding

Environmental/genetic Risk Factors and Pathogenesis of Autoimmune DiseaseZIAES101074 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RIDER, LISA · 2009 to 2025
$34.6M
Assessment, Therapy and Prevention Of Autoimmune DiseaseZIAES101081 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RIDER, LISA · 2009 to 2025
$17.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES101081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to assess changes in myositis core set measures and ancillary clinical and laboratory data from the National Institutes of Health's subset of patients enrolled in the Rituximab in Myositis trial.

methodsEighteen patients (5 dermatomyositis, 8 polymyositis, 5 juvenile dermatomyositis) completed more in-depth testing of muscle strength and cutaneous assessments, patient-reported outcomes, and laboratory tests before and after administration of rituximab. Percentage change in individual measures and in the definitions of improvement (DOIs) and standardized response means were examined over 44 weeks.

resultsCore set activity measures improved by 18-70% from weeks 0-44 and were sensitive to change. Fifteen patients met the DOI at week 44, 9 patients met a DOI 50% response, and 4 met a DOI 70% response. Muscle strength and function measures were more sensitive to change than cutaneous assessments. Constitutional, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary systems improved 44-70%. Patient-reported outcomes improved up to 28%. CD20+ B cells were depleted in the periphery, but B cell depletion was not associated with clinical improvement at week 16.

conclusionsThis subset of patients had high rates of clinical response to rituximab, similar to patients in the overall trial. Most measures were responsive, and muscle strength had a greater degree of change than cutaneous assessments. Several novel assessment tools, including measures of strength and function, extra-muscular organ activity, fatigue, and health-related quality of life, are promising for use in future myositis trials. Further study of B cell-depleting therapies in myositis, particularly in treatment-naïve patients, is warranted.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiomarkersB-LymphocytesChildFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthMyositisPredictive Value of TestsRecovery of FunctionAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiomarkersRituximab

Identifiers

PMID25068290
PMCPMC4644185
OpenAlexW251402620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.