Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25068268›Full record

ReviewParasitology2015

Genome evolution in trypanosomatid parasites.

Andrew P Jackson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasitology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nuclear Genome Assembly and Annotation of Kinetoplastids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptomic Analysis of Trypanosomatids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Organization of Trypanosoma cruzi tRNA Genes.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Genomes ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cytotoxicity of Essential OilMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. LeishIF4E-5 Is a Promastigote-Specific Cap-Binding Protein inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrew P JacksonDepartment of Infection Biology, Institute of Infection and Global Health,University of Liverpool,Liverpool Science Park Ic2, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF,UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 097826/Z/11/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decade of genome sequencing has transformed our understanding of how trypanosomatid parasites have evolved and provided fresh impetus to explaining the origins of parasitism in the Kinetoplastida. In this review, I will consider the many ways in which genome sequences have influenced our view of genomic reduction in trypanosomatids; how species-specific genes, and the genomic domains they occupy, have illuminated the innovations in trypanosomatid genomes; and how comparative genomics has exposed the molecular mechanisms responsible for innovation and adaptation to a parasitic lifestyle.

Indexed as

GenomicsBase SequenceBiological EvolutionGenome, ProtozoanKinetoplastidaLeishmaniaPhylogenySpecies SpecificityTrypanosomaparasitism

Identifiers

PMID25068268
PMCPMC4413820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.