Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25068111›Full record

SynthesisNeuroImage. Clinical2014

Neuroimaging essentials in essential tremor: a systematic review.

Sarvi Sharifi, Aart J Nederveen, Jan Booij, Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. No reliable gray matter changes in essential tremor.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Structural brain differences in essential tremor and Parkinson's disease deep brain stimulation patients.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2023
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Cerebellar α6GABANeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarvi SharifiDepartment of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; Brain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aart J NederveenBrain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan BooijBrain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne-Fleur van RootselaarDepartment of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; Brain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEssential tremor is regarded to be a disease of the central nervous system. Neuroimaging is a rapidly growing field with potential benefits to both diagnostics and research. The exact role of imaging techniques with respect to essential tremor in research and clinical practice is not clear. A systematic review of the different imaging techniques in essential tremor is lacking in the literature.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature search combining the terms essential tremor and familial tremor with the following keywords: imaging, mri, vbm, dwi, fmri, pet and spect, both in abbreviated form as well as in full form. We summarize and discuss the quality and the external validity of each study and place the results in the context of existing knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of essential tremor.

resultsA total of 48 neuroimaging studies met our search criteria, roughly divided into 19 structural and 29 functional and metabolic studies. The quality of the studies varied, especially concerning inclusion criteria. Functional imaging studies indicated cerebellar hyperactivity during rest and during tremor. The studies also pointed to the involvement of the thalamus, the inferior olive and the red nucleus. Structural studies showed less consistent results. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionNeuroimaging techniques in essential tremor give insight into the pathophysiology of essential tremor indicating the involvement of the cerebellum as the most consistent finding. GABAergic dysfunction might be a major premise in the pathophysiological hypotheses. Inconsistencies between studies can be partly explained by the inclusion of heterogeneous patient groups. Improvement of scientific research requires more stringent inclusion criteria and application of advanced analysis techniques. Also, the use of multimodal neuroimaging techniques is a promising development in movement disorders research. Currently, the role of imaging techniques in essential tremor in daily clinical practice is limited.

Indexed as

BrainEssential TremorHumansNeuroimagingDWI, diffusion weighted imagingEssential tremorfMRI, functional magnetic resonance imagingMRIMRI, magnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingPathophysiologyPET, positron emission tomographyReviewScintigraphySPECT, single-photon emission computed tomographyVBM, voxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID25068111
PMCPMC4110352
OpenAlexW2028305596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.