ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2014
Real-Time Nanoparticle-Cell Interactions in Physiological Media by Atomic Force Microscopy.
Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoparticle Detection in Biology and Medicine: A Review.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Molecular Basis of Nanocalcium-Induced Health Regulation in Zebra Fish (Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Polymeric nanocarrier-based adjuvants to enhance a locally produced mucosal coryza vaccine in chicken.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Biocompatibility Evaluation of TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Rational nanoparticle design: Optimization using insights from experiments and mathematical models.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023Review
- Method for nanoparticles uptake evaluation based on double labeled fluorescent cells scanned in enhanced darkfield microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Biogenic Selenium Nanoparticles in Biomedical Sciences: Properties, Current Trends, Novel Opportunities and Emerging Challenges in Theranostic Nanomedicine.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Tools shaping drug discovery and development.Biophysics reviews · 2022Review
- Co-exposure to boscalid and TiONanoImpact · 2021Article
- Nanoparticle Wettability Influences Nanoparticle-Phospholipid Interactions.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Interaction of poly-l-lysine coating and heparan sulfate proteoglycan on magnetic nanoparticle uptake by tumor cells.International journal of nanomedicine · 2018Article
- Protein corona: implications for nanoparticle interactions with pulmonary cells.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2017Article
- An integrated methodology for assessing the impact of food matrix and gastrointestinal effects on the biokinetics and cellular toxicity of ingested engineered nanomaterials.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2017Article
- Preparation, characterization, and in vitro dosimetry of dispersed, engineered nanomaterials.Nature protocols · 2017Article
- Article
- Buoyant Nanoparticles: Implications for Nano-Biointeractions in Cellular Studies.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2016Article
- The role of natural processes and surface energy of inhaled engineered nanoparticles on aggregation and corona formation.NanoImpact · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Particle-cell interactions in physiological media are important in determining the fate and transport of nanoparticles and biological responses to them. In this work, these interactions are assessed in real time using a novel atomic force microscopy (AFM) based platform. Industry-relevant CeO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.