ArticleYonago acta medica2014
Bone mineral density in residents of care facilities for the aged and effect of pharmacotherapy.
Article in Yonago acta medica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBone mineral densitometry has been proven to be a powerful tool for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis, which is increasing with aging of the population, but opportunities to perform bone mineral densitometry in elderly facility residents, who are at a high risk of fracture, are scarce.
methodsWe measured the bone mineral density in 315 residents of 5 care facilities for the aged in middle Tottori Prefecture from 2002 to 2006. We also evaluated residents of an elderly nursing home with a history of fragility fracture and those with osteoporosis who were administered risedronate for its therapeutic effect.
resultsThe bone mineral density was less than 70% of the young adult mean in 161 (51.1%) of the 315 subjects (aged 83.1 ± 7.8 years), 149 (57.8%) of the 258 women (83.9 ± 7.2 years), and 12 (21.1%) of the 57 men (79.8 ± 9.3 years). In the 13 subjects who were administered risedronate, the bone mineral density increased from 65.8 to 67.2% of the young adult mean from before to after the beginning of administration, but it decreased in the control group (n = 9). In those administered risedronate, the urinary level of N-telopeptide (a marker for bone resorption) began to decrease 3 months after the beginning of the administration and showed a significant decrease after 11 months (n = 8) compared with the control group. The mean pain score based on the visual analogue scale showed significant reduction in the risedronate group compared with the control group.
conclusionThe bone mineral density was low in the facility residents and was less than 70% of the young adult mean in 57.8% of women and in 21.1% of men, more frequently than expected. Bone resorption and osteoporotic pain were suppressed by risedronate in osteopenic patients in such care facility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25067877PMC4110689W2127894683What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.